Sign up ×
Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I only ask this because of how fast light travels. The question remains in the title. Why, or why not, would this work?

share|improve this question
Mirror or not, we are always seeing into the past. When you read a book you are seeing the book as it was a very small fraction of a second ago. – astromax Jan 15 '14 at 0:47
You couldn't use this method to see times before the mirror was put in place. For example, a mirror 1 light-year away would (in principle) let us see Earth as it was 2 years ago -- but it would take more than a year to get it there. – Keith Thompson Jan 15 '14 at 16:55
I can't believe somebody else asked this, I almost finished asking this question when I saw a link to this one. – SSH This Nov 24 '14 at 18:09

4 Answers 4

up vote 8 down vote accepted

I think the question is referring to situating a very large mirror in space facing earth. If we were to put it several light minutes away, then events occurring opposite the mirror could be reviewed de novo with more preparation upon the warning we received upon the first light of the event arriving at earth.

For example, a supernova going off in M31 might not be under observation at the moment its light first arrives, and so the initial observations might be lost. However, with a mirror facing M31, we would be able to observe that mirror as the event unfolded, having been warned that there was something worth watching, in advance.

Nice idea! But it would likely be much less expensive to simply have multiple telescopes always watching "prime" starscape for unexpected events.

share|improve this answer
That's an interesting interpretation of the question. – Stan Liou Jan 15 '14 at 1:07
My question exactly. So it would work? – ilarsona Jan 15 '14 at 4:17
Of course it would work, @ilarsona. It would be prohibitively expensive, though. And a mirror for one direction would block the view to the other. – Cyberherbalist Jan 15 '14 at 17:37
@ilarsona Suppose an advanced extraterrestrial race living 4.5 billion years ago constructed a perfectly flawless mirror of sufficient size 4.5 billion light years from Earth, pointed precisely at Earth. We would today be able to watch the entire history of the Earth play out by observing the Earth in that mirror through our telescopes. Whether such a mirror could be constructed is another matter. – called2voyage Jan 15 '14 at 18:43
So what about just a couple cameras then? Sure... hubble and all that, but those work with in the field of light as well... can we record the past? – ilarsona Jan 15 '14 at 20:03

Yes, we always look into the past, when looking somewhere. There is for instance a mirror on the moon. When sending a laser beam to that mirror, we can detect the reflected light about 2.5 seconds later. This could be interpreted as looking 2.5 seconds into the past, when the laser has been fired. Details here.

share|improve this answer
Some quantum tunneling effects ( have been discussed to travel faster than light, although weakening the signal; I can't rule out, that this is possible. – Gerald Jan 14 '14 at 20:59
More about that discussion here: – Gerald Jan 14 '14 at 21:08
0.3 meters per nanosecond. – Wayfaring Stranger Sep 21 '14 at 15:21

I've always wondered about this same question. In my opinion it could be possible, but I guess we would need a really powerful telescope to see proper images of the Earth through a distant mirror.

I can also imagine instead of sending a distant mirror sending a telescope facing the earth.

share|improve this answer

Here are some thoughts adapted to an answer I placed on Phyiscs SE to a similar question some time ago. In order to observe the past we need to detect light from the Earth, reflected back to us from somewhere distant in space.

The average albedo of the Earth is about 0.3 (i.e. it reflects 30 percent of the light incident upon it). The amount of incident radiation from the Sun at any moment is the solar constant ($F \sim 1.3 \times 10^3$ Wm$^{-2}$) integrated over a hemisphere. Thus the total reflected light from the Earth is about $L=5\times 10^{16}$ W.

If this light from the Earth has the same spectrum as sunlight and it gets reflected from something which is positioned optimally - i.e. it sees the full illuminated hemisphere. then, roughly speaking, the incident flux on a reflecting body will be $L/2\pi d^2$ (because it is scattered roughly into a hemisphere of the sky).

Now we have to explore some divergent scenarios.

  1. There just happens to be a large object at a distance that is highly reflective. I'll use 1000 light years away as an example, which would allow us to see 2000 years into the Earth's past.

Let's be generous and say it is a perfect reflector, but we can't assume specular reflection. Instead let's assume the reflected light is also scattered isotropically into a $2\pi$ solid angle. Thus the radiation we get back will be $$ f = \frac{L}{2\pi d^2} \frac{\pi r^2}{2\pi d^2} = \frac{L r^2}{4\pi d^4},$$ where $r$ is the radius of the thing doing the reflecting.

To turn a flux into an astronomical magnitude we note that the Sun has a visual magnitude of $-26.74$. The apparent magnitude of the reflected light will be given by $$ m = 2.5\log_{10} \left(\frac{F}{f}\right) -26.74 = 2.5 \log_{10} \left(\frac{4F \pi d^4}{L r^2}\right) -26.74 $$

So let's put in some numbers. Assume $r=R_{\odot}$ (i.e. a reflector as big as the Sun) and let $d$ be 1000 light years. From this I calculate $m=85$.

To put this in context, the Hubble space telescope ultra deep field has a magnitude limit of around $m=30$ ( ) and each 5 magnitudes on top of that corresponds to a factor of 100 decrease in brightness. So $m=85$ is about 22 orders of magnitude fainter than detectable by HST. What's worse, the reflector also scatters all the light from the rest of the universe, so picking out the signal from the earth will be utterly futile.

  1. A big, flat mirror 1000 light years away.

How did it get there? Let's leave that aside. In this case we would just be looking at an image of the Earth as if it were 2000 light years away (assuming everything gets reflected). The flux received back at Earth in this case: $$ f = \frac{L}{2\pi [2d]^2} $$ with $d=1000$ light years, which will result in an apparent magnitude at the earth of $m=37$.

OK, this is more promising, but still 7 magnitudes below detection with the HST and perhaps 5 magnitudes fainter than might be detected with the James Webb Space Telescope if and when it does an ultra-deep field. It is unclear whether the sky will be actually full of optical sources at this level of faintness and so even higher spatial resolution than HST/JWST might be required to pick it out even if we had the sensitivity.

  1. Just send a telescope to 1000 light years, observe the Earth, analyse the data and send the signal back to Earth.

Of course this doesn't help you see into the past because we would have to send the telescope there. But it could help those in the future see into their past.

Assuming this is technically feasible, the Earth will have a maximum brightness corresponding to $m \sim 35$ so something a lot better than JWST would be required and that ignores the problem of the brightness contrast with the Sun, which would be separated by only 0.03 arcseconds from the Earth at that distance.

Note also that these calculations are merely to detect the light from the whole Earth. To extract anything meaningful would mean collecting a spectrum at the very least! And all this is for only 2000 years into the past.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.