Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

According to the theory of relativity (If I understand correctly), nothing is supposed to be able to travel faster then the speed of light. I believe, to my limited knowledge and grasp of the concept, that quantum theorie speaks against, i.e. extend, the theory of relativity, hence my question:

Suppose we find (or imagine) a place in the universe where there is no obstruction for this thought experiment to take place. We take a spherical object and attach a spire at both sides so you get an object shaped like this: -O-

We start turning the object so the ends of the spire travel in an orbital mather according to the spherical object. What if the sphere starts to orbit near the spead of light, wouldn't the ends of the spires travel faster than the speed of light?

Sorry if this is the wrong place for this question.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by called2voyage Feb 3 '14 at 16:35

  • This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Related Physics.SE question:… – called2voyage Feb 3 '14 at 16:34
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about the theory of relativity without any concrete reference to astronomy. which is more appropriate at Physics Stack Exchange (where an answer to this question already exists). – called2voyage Feb 3 '14 at 16:35
up vote 3 down vote accepted

This would be more appropiate at Physics.s.c but here is the answer nonetheless.

Your object may be perfectly rigid or not.

If the object is perfectly rigid, you would not be able to accelerate it to the point at which the extreme points of the spires reach the speed of light, because when they are approaching it, their mass will increment towards infinity and the energy you will need to continue accelerating will increment to infinity as well.

So you will simply not be able to accelerate the whole thing to a rotation speed where the extreme points will reach the speed of light.

If the object is not rigid, well, it will simply bend, plus the previous explanation.

share|improve this answer
This weirds me out, if there is no friction in space, I can't imagine more needed energy. Thank you for the answer. – Nkciy84 Feb 3 '14 at 11:46
Yes, the speed of light is hard to reach not because friction, but for the increment of mass. Photons have mass 0 so they reach easily the speed of light (in fact, they can not travel slower! - at least in vacuum) – Envite Feb 3 '14 at 11:49
So faster movement means increase of weight means increase in energy needed to turn the sphere. What if we replaced the spires with, say, lasers? I guess you would create a situation where gravity starts to pull on the light emitted. – Nkciy84 Feb 3 '14 at 11:54
Lasers are light, not matter. You can have speeds larger than 'c' due to the geometrical effect, but these will not be the speed of any material object. Gravity not affectin there. – Envite Feb 3 '14 at 12:06

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.