Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Some quick googling has given me the answer to whether seeing part of the moon that receives no sunlight is an optical illusion or not: it isn't. Earthshine lights the moon enough for the human eye to notice.

However, it seems clear to me that the outline of the unlit part of the crescent moon is brighter than the surface. I was riding my bike home yesterday on a clear winter night, and became confused on why that could be. What mechanism is responsible for making the edge brighter than the dark part of the moon? Or is it my brain trying to make a circle?

Here's an example of what I mean.

share|improve this question
If I'm understanding you correctly, you're asking me to cover up the crescent completely. Then you are telling me that the edge of the unlit portion of the moon is brighter than the center of the unlit portion of the moon. If this is all correct, first of all, I don't see it. Second of all, this can very easily be tested. You have the image. Import it into your favorite image manipulation program (here's one for free:, and see for yourself. – astromax Feb 5 '14 at 2:57
If you find anything report back here. – astromax Feb 5 '14 at 2:58
fair enough, I just fiddled with photoshop for 15 minutes, putting a black circle over the moon and using the color picker.. but I am running into pixel issues. Can't really confirm or deny... somehow it still looks brighter to me. – Spork Feb 5 '14 at 9:52
There are also color variations intrinsic to the surface of the moon - craters, highlands, and lava planes which look lighter and darker depending on their material composition. Perhaps this is why you seeing lighter and darker around the edges. – astromax Feb 5 '14 at 15:12
@astromax points it out correctly; The nearer it is to new moon, the longer are the shadows on moon, improving the contrast, highlighting features of the surface. – Alexander Janssen Feb 7 '14 at 9:40

In the image you are now refering to the only significant brightness difference is between the mare and the "highlands".

The retina enhances edges. So you'll see edges enhanced, even if they aren't.

By image processing edges can also be enhanced to make contours clearer. This is not the case for the referred image.

To better assess, which part of the perception is real, and which is illusion, here the illusion part: Moon illusion part

share|improve this answer

It appears that way because there is more land reflecting sun light to your retina at the edges. This is because the Moon is a sphere. As you move your eye from the center of the moon towards the edges, you are scanning over increasingly more amounts of reflective rock. Hence, the edges appear very bright relative to the center.

It's all about surface area.

share|improve this answer
A sphere lit by ambient light appears to be the same brightness all over. A sphere lit by a light near the observer (like in this case) appears brighter in the center and dimmer on the edges. I do not think the surface area analysis holds up. – Dan Bliss Feb 14 '14 at 18:19

Taking the two answers, the comments, and the lack of a reason why it would actually happen I'll attribute my misperception to the cognitive illusion illustrated by Ernst Mach's Mach Bands. See also the Wikipedia article on lateral inhibition.

Such a shame... I was hoping for some physics effect for bending light around the earth into the moon.

Mach bands illusion

share|improve this answer
It's not a misperception. There is simply more light being reflected at the edges because there is more land area. – Stu Feb 6 '14 at 17:35

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.