Take the 2-minute tour ×
Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

The usual explanation is that escape velocity of a black hole is above speed of light, therefore nothing can escape because nothing can move faster than light.

This is however a fallacy, because escape velocity only pertains to bodies "without propulsion", or in other words without any force other than gravity acting on them. As an example I could theoretically escape Earth's gravity at a walking speed, just give me a staircase and I could walk all the way to the Moon. No need to accelerate to 11 km/s at any point.

How does this affect black holes? Why cannot I have a staircase and climb out?

I know the staircase idea must be wrong, but I would like to know why. My guess is that I am applying Newtonian mechanics to a problem which requires general relativity approach, because Newtonian mechanics approximation fails badly around such massive gravity fields?

Anyway, according to Newtonian mechanics one can easily escape a black hole, even if we assume that speed of light cannot be exceeded.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Stan Liou, Eduardo Serra, TildalWave, Gerald, e-sushi Jun 18 at 19:51

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

add comment

2 Answers 2

That subject is highly controverse and paradoxical, see e.g. Stephen Hawking's recent paper.

Taking the Schwarzschild black hole as the simplest case, space is falling into the black hole. At the event horizon this speed is the speed of light. Since nothing can travel faster than light, you cannot escape. Actually you'll be slower than light, therefore dragged into the black hole together with the space.

share|improve this answer
add comment

A great explanation; all credit goes to: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/sci.physics.research/PZh0yawL2nA/YKbv-EpWJPsJ

The explaination of a black hole in terms of escape velocity is not a good way to think of a black hole. The escape velocity is merely the intial speed at which a projectile must be fired from a large body in order so that, given that only gravitational forces act on it (which is a scenario very far from reality) it will never return to that body.

However, anything that passes through the event horizon of a black hole will never be on the other side. Even if it were to constantly accelerate away from the black hole, it would still be going inward. This is not true of Newtonian gravity. In fact, in Newtonian gravity, there are no black holes, because there is no universal speed limit.

The best way to think of an event horizon is where spacetime is so bent that all paths 'curve inwards', IE, the lightcones all point inward, so there is no chance of escape.

BTW, in GR, it's not good to explain the effects of gravity as a FORCE. It is as much a force as the Centrifugal Force or the Coriolis Force. There is an amount of force needed to stay the same distance from an object, IE, to overcome gravity, however. And as you approach the black hole, the amount of force required approaches infinity. But to say that there is an infinite amount of force PULLING on someone is not very accurate.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.