Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

For instance, we live in the Milky Way Galaxy. We don't just call it "The Galaxy", because we know there are multiple different galaxies. So if we lived in a multiverse, it wouldn't make much sense to keep calling our universe "The Universe".

How are names for things like this created, and what would a likely name for our universe be?

share|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by called2voyage Feb 25 '14 at 16:27

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

This question appears to be off-topic because it is not within the scope of astronomy as defined in the help centre. – RhysW Feb 23 '14 at 12:07
@Rhys, very reasonable and good question. If questions whether pluto is a planet and alike are discussed at IAU meetings, why would it be unreasonable to speculate on the possible names for our part of the multiverse? – Alexey Bobrick Feb 23 '14 at 14:26
@AlexeyBobrick predominantly because we try to avoid things that are mainly speculation as it does not lead to constructive, source verified answers. Though I am willing to concede that I make mistakes, if the community votes to reopen then I will happily oblige – RhysW Feb 24 '14 at 21:48
@AlexeyBobrick I reclosed with hopefully a more clear close reason. I wouldn't exactly say it is off topic, but we have no reliable methodology for determining what the IAU might name our universe, especially since names for unique items in a set are usually derived from features which distinguish them from other items in the set. Since we do not know what other universes are like (if they exist), this leaves us with really nothing to work with. – called2voyage Feb 25 '14 at 16:30
There's already a precedent set for this at the "Universe Or Multiverse?" conference at Stanford in 2003 (see the book of the same name, ISBN 9780521140690) where, contrary to your suggestion, it's simply "(a) universe" and "(our) Universe" - note the capitalization. (This was, however, prior to the Universy McUniverseface style trend ;) – The Geoff May 18 at 18:42
up vote 3 down vote accepted

New objects usually get some preliminary name or number according to one or more naming or numbering conventions (e.g. HR numbers for stars). If there aren't too many objects of interest, they are named by the discoverer(s) (e.g. Hubble volume), an institution (e.g. PANSTARRS), an occasional nickname liked by the public (e.g. black hole), or by a majority in a commitee or an election (e.g. Hydra).

For our universe I can only speculate; probably a notion of the respective multiverse theory would become part of the name, e.g. "Herman brane", if we take a brane cosmology as an example.

share|improve this answer
In a Multiverse Universe why not just call our Universe the Earth Universe ? – Peter U Feb 24 '15 at 22:40

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.