Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would assume that, with light from more distant areas in space reaching the earth, we should be able to see more distant (and older) objects.
However there's lot of weird stuff regarding the space expansion that could eventually make the objects leaving us so fast the we'd never see them.

So, did we reach any boundary of what we can possibly see, or are we still working on more sensitive exploration devices?

I'll be grateful for some useful re-tag

share|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

No, the expansion of the universe appears to be accelerating. Hence distant objects get more and more red-shifted. Our horizon is shrinking instead of expanding. At the end, only galaxies which are sufficiently bound by gravity remain visible; this could turn out to be the Virgo supercluster.

More reading about the accelerating universe on Wikipedia, and on National Geographic.

Scientific background to the according Nobel Prize in physics 2011.

share|improve this answer
Is that already proven? It's kinda scary... – Tomáš Zato Mar 1 '14 at 16:22
@TomášZato It's the current main stream opinion, mainly based on supernova Ia observations, worth a Nobel's Prize. You can never exclude a systematic error with absolute certainty, but it's unlikely that such an error would be large enough to lead to a fundamentally different result. – Gerald Mar 1 '14 at 18:42

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.