# Relation between position of stars and locations of gemstones? [closed]

A theory has been said that the patterns and positions help identify where valuable gemstones are hidden. I am wondering if this has any truth in it.

-

## closed as off-topic by Jeremy, Stan Liou, called2voyage♦Apr 24 '14 at 15:12

• This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

No.​​​​​​​​​​​​ –  Stan Liou Apr 24 '14 at 4:01
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about complete and utter drivel, not astronomy –  Jeremy Apr 24 '14 at 5:29
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about pseudoscience. –  called2voyage Apr 24 '14 at 15:12
No truth at all. Where did you get this? –  TheBluegrassMathematician Apr 24 '14 at 15:26

Long answer: No, there is no truth in that, at all. No body out of our Solar System could interfere in Earth's techtonics nor in Geology in any way.

-
Can you really go so far to say this? I'm just curious for a mathematical proof. Say black whole of a few solar masses where to make a close pass by the solar system or some similar situation. Could this not perturb orbits ultimately leading various surface perturbations? Just postulation. The gemstones part is total nonsense but I just question your second sentence. –  TheBluegrassMathematician Apr 24 '14 at 19:51
@RyanMcGaha: A mass that large that close is actually rather unreasonable, but let's roll with it anyway. Take the gravitational tidal forces on the Earth due to the Moon (orbital distance $R$) as the standard of comparison. The ones due to the Sun are $(M/m)(R/1\,\mathrm{AU})^3 \sim 1/2$ as large. Say the "size" of the solar system as roughly the heliopause distance $120\,\mathrm{AU}$, so that the tidal forces of this hypothetical mass are at most $3\times 10^{-7}$ of the Moon's. –  Stan Liou Apr 25 '14 at 5:17
Alright I see how you got your answer now. Sorry, I like to see math to prove it. –  TheBluegrassMathematician Apr 25 '14 at 16:12