Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A theory has been said that the patterns and positions help identify where valuable gemstones are hidden. I am wondering if this has any truth in it.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by Jeremy, Stan Liou, called2voyage Apr 24 '14 at 15:12

  • This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

No.​​​​​​​​​​​​ – Stan Liou Apr 24 '14 at 4:01
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about complete and utter drivel, not astronomy – Jeremy Apr 24 '14 at 5:29
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about pseudoscience. – called2voyage Apr 24 '14 at 15:12
No truth at all. Where did you get this? – TheBluegrassMathematician Apr 24 '14 at 15:26

Short answer: No.

Long answer: No, there is no truth in that, at all. No body out of our Solar System could interfere in Earth's techtonics nor in Geology in any way.

share|improve this answer
Can you really go so far to say this? I'm just curious for a mathematical proof. Say black whole of a few solar masses where to make a close pass by the solar system or some similar situation. Could this not perturb orbits ultimately leading various surface perturbations? Just postulation. The gemstones part is total nonsense but I just question your second sentence. – TheBluegrassMathematician Apr 24 '14 at 19:51
@RyanMcGaha: A mass that large that close is actually rather unreasonable, but let's roll with it anyway. Take the gravitational tidal forces on the Earth due to the Moon (orbital distance $R$) as the standard of comparison. The ones due to the Sun are $(M/m)(R/1\,\mathrm{AU})^3 \sim 1/2$ as large. Say the "size" of the solar system as roughly the heliopause distance $120\,\mathrm{AU}$, so that the tidal forces of this hypothetical mass are at most $3\times 10^{-7}$ of the Moon's. – Stan Liou Apr 25 '14 at 5:17
Alright I see how you got your answer now. Sorry, I like to see math to prove it. – TheBluegrassMathematician Apr 25 '14 at 16:12

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.