Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

There are many more stars in the universe than the years that the universe has been in existence, so wouldn't this mean that stars were/are forming at an astounding rate?

share|improve this question
It depends, on where and when. You should constrain a bit your question. Also the very first statement is not clear to me. – Py-ser May 7 '14 at 8:51
That depends on your definition of what is an astounding rate. – DrCopyPaste May 7 '14 at 10:26

By an estimated order of magnitude there are about $10^{22}$ in our observable universe (hundred billion galaxies with hundred billion stars, each, as a rough estimate), and the universe exits since (order of magnitude) $10^{10}$ years. Hence the average formation rate of stars has been about $10^{12}$ per year, meaning more than 10,000 per second, give or take a factor of 100. This calculation ignores stars which don't exist any more, but for an order-of-magnitude estimate numbers should be ok.

Although the star formation rate has been much higher in the younger universe than today. (One of the press releases about star formation in the early universe)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.