Take the 2-minute tour ×
Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was scrolling idly through the Wikipedia article on Orion when I read:

Orion will still be recognizable long after most of the other constellations—composed of relatively nearby stars—have distorted into new configurations, with the exception of a few of its stars eventually exploding as supernovae, for example Betelgeuse, which is predicted to explode sometime in the next million years.

Given that Betelgeuse is only 640 light-years away from Earth, the question of whether we're talking about Betelgeuse going supernova in the next million years, or about news of the supernova reaching us in the next million years, is irrelevant, since 640 years is hardly noticeable when you're talking about ten thousand centuries.

But what about a star further away? Say, something in the Andromeda Galaxy, 2.5 million light-years from us? If I read an article stating that a star in the Andromeda Galaxy was going nova in a million years, would that mean:

a) That we think the star will go nova one million years from now, and its light will reach us in 3.5 million years; or
b) That we believe the star went nova 1.5 million years ago, and its light will reach us in one million years

In other words, are we making estimates in our time, or in celestial-body-local time?

share|improve this question
    
Probably our time. –  Cheeku May 19 at 13:57
    
We have an equivalent question on Space: space.stackexchange.com/q/5875/38 –  Rory Alsop 2 days ago

1 Answer 1

We express when events are going to happen (or have happened) in our observed time frame.

For example, we say SN 185 went supernova in the year AD 185; but it didn't. The star actually physically exploded about 9,100 years earlier.

When we say the sun will set tonight at 8:07 PM ET, that is when we observe the event. But our actual position relative to the tangent from the sun will have already passed about 8 minutes 20 seconds earlier (plus several minutes due to atmospheric refraction).

So when you say Betelgeuse is predicted to explode sometime in the next million years, that's how many more Earth years are expected to pass until we see it happen… from here. From Betelgeuse's point of view, it would have happened about 642 years earlier… or it may have happened already.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.