Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What gases do you need to start the creation of a star, and why do you need these gases? What are their functions?

share|improve this question
You don't really need 'gases' per say - you just need matter, specifically atoms with low nuclear weights. If somehow a huge amount of frozen water (i.e. hydrogen and oxygen) got together, you'd also get a star. – john3103 Oct 23 '13 at 15:23
up vote 7 down vote accepted

It depends on the kind of star you want to make.

Basically, what you really need is hydrodgen; as soon as enough hydrodgen is gathered somewhere and collapse, you end up with a star.

But, if you just have hydrodgen, you will get a very massive star, and with a history different than the stars observed in the local Universe. Why so?

  • hydrodgen is a poor coolant, therefore the Jeans' mass (the minimum mass for a density structure to gravitationally collapse), which strongly depends on temperature, will be much higher if the temperature is higher. In practice, it means that the formed stars will be much more massive.
  • you need at least a small fraction of carbon to launch the CNO cycle in stellar cores (CNO cycle is one of the two ways to burn hydrodgen and to turn it into helium); stellar cores are then hotter and denser, and stars become hotter and more luminous.

So if you want to make a star as we typically observe in our galaxy, you will need also some molecules (hopefully there are plenty of them) and also some carbon. Else, you'll get big, massive, hot and luminous stars. Like the first generation of stars (called Population III stars, you can see here if you want more dirty details) in the early Universe.

share|improve this answer

Any gas that has a lower atomic mass than iron. The only condition on the gas is that nuclear fusion with it should be exothermic (the energy required to fuse the nuclei should be less than the energy obtained).

However, usually a majority of hydrogen is the best. If the majority gas is of a higher element, we'll need a sufficient gravitational force to initiate the fusion, and that's not always easy.

While it is possible for just hydrogen to start fusion in a star, some carbon or nitrogen is a good thing to have to start fusion more efficiently.

Different initial conditions lead to different kinds of stars.

share|improve this answer

No specific gases are actually needed. It's more like this: the interstellar gas is predominately hydrogen gas. It is hydrogen that is fused at the center of the sphere of gas when the gas sphere becomes a star. However, if the cloud were made of carbon gas, for instance, the sphere could eventually fuse carbon nuclei together (to make larger nuclei), as it first "turned on." Just about any gas will do. The different sorts of gas spheres would produce different sorts of stars (brighter or dimmer, larger or smaller).

Source + Reference

share|improve this answer
Hi Timtech. It's great to see your enthusiasm on the site. You've asked a lot of questions and are clearly interested in the topic. It's also wonderful to see that you've read and researched the answers you give. However, Stack Exchange sites are interested in answers that go beyond quoting other sites. There's lots of reasons for this, but one of the most important is that we want to respect other people's content. By all means quote and link to other sources. But we ask that you also expand on the outside source from your own knowledge. Does that make sense? – Jon Ericson Sep 27 '13 at 0:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.