Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The planet Uranus is another solar system anomaly, where according to the NASA profile has an axial tilt of 97.8 degrees, also considered to be retrograde. This NASA summary "Uranus" suggests the current theory of a large planet-sized impact earlier in its history.

Does the planet-impact theory still hold true or have new accepted theories come to light?

Most of all, are there any results from any simulations available?

A note, this is posted as a separate question to my other question "What is the current accepted theory as to why Venus has a slow retrograde rotation?" as the axial tilt is significantly different.

share|improve this question
Well, sorry to all responses but there is no accepted theory. A theory must be founded on axioms that make predictions that are testable against evidence. To that end we don't have any theories, just specilation. – AtmosphericPrisonEscape Mar 5 at 0:53
up vote 12 down vote accepted speculates that "It is possible that an Earth-sized object crashed into Uranus and caused Uranus to rotate on its side."

A recent test by suggests that "Planet Uranus Got Sideways Tilt From Multiple Impacts".

They found that a series of at least two smaller collisions can explain the moons' motions much better than a single giant impact, researchers said. The early solar system thus may have been a more volatile and violent place than previously thought, they added.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.