Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A randomness beacon is a source of random data that is broadcast to multiple parties. Users listening to the beacon receive the same sequence of random strings and no one can predict the values in advance. This is a construct that has many applications in cryptography and distributed communications. Such random sequences have been generated using atmospheric noise, quantum measurements, and financial data (*).

Using astronomical radio sources (such as meteor bursts, solar noise, planetary observations, CMBR, etc.), is it possible for multiple independent observers spread around the globe, using relatively inexpensive equipment, to detect the same unpredictable cosmic signals, and agree on the time and properties of those signals (to within some margin of error)?

If this were feasible, you could create a publicly-verifiable randomness beacon that didn't require trusting a central authority to generate the sequence in an unbiased way. Instead, observers can certify the random values independently using their own local measurements.

(*) usenix dot org /legacy/events/evtwote10/tech/full_papers/Clark.pdf

share|improve this question
This was cross-posted on Crypto.SE. OP should pick one site and stick with it. Delete from the other. – mikeazo Jul 14 '14 at 14:59
The question on Cryptography SE has now been removed. – HDE 226868 Sep 14 '14 at 15:53

I see two problems. 1) Any particular source in the sky is above the horizon for a limited region of the Earth at a given time, so one would need to relay the signal around the globe. 2) It is hard to think of an astronomical source that is truly random all of the time. Astronomical sources are physical systems reacting to internal and environmental changes that are causal, so they all tend to be partially quasiperiodic to some degree or become temporarily nearly periodic. So it depends on just how random you need them to be, but I doubt any astronomical source is dependable for this purpose.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.