Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I have 2 questions related to spiral galaxies.

Firstly, how did the arms form? Why would the stars accumulate into those specific areas? And secondly, why are they still intact?

The inner parts of the arms must be revolving more rapidly than the outer parts, so surely the would become stretched and then no longer resemble arms, but simply a disk around the galactic center.

share|improve this question

Actually, the stars and nebulae that make up the spiral arm are only temporarily part of that spiral arm. Spiral arms are more like sound waves where individual particles move around a more or less stationary position. (Look for instance at the animation of longitudinal waves from Dan Russel, the red dots move a bit to the left and to the right around a stationary position). Dust, gas and stars move towards or away from another just as longitudinal waves. Where the dust, gas and stars come close together (and where, therefore, the density increases), spiral arms can be seen as more stars are close together increasing the brightness at that position in the galaxy.

This effect is, furthermore, much increased because the increased density of dust and gas in the spiral arm causes protostars to form. The brightest stars burn up their energy so fast that they will cease to exist even before the longitudinal wave (the spiral arm) has passed. These very bright stars only exist for a small portion of their orbital period around the galaxy's centre, and only while they are in the spiral arm. The large majority of stars exist much longer, but are also much dimmer and contribute only little to the overal brightness of the galaxy.

This causes the spiral arms to be so much brighter than the rest of the disk, where also a lot of stars exist. But these can hardly be seen as they are much dimmer.

Of course, the stars do not revolve around a stable position in the galaxy (as the red dots in the wave animation) but follow their own orbits around the centre of the galaxy. Sometimes a bit faster, and sometimes a bit slower depending on the position relative to the spiral arms.

Because the spiral arms are waves, it does not matter that stars near the centre move faster than the stars at the edge. It just means that they will be part of the spiral arm for a shorter period of time.

share|improve this answer

To add to Dieudonné's excellent answer, I'd like to say that spiral arms are only really prominent in the blue part of the spectrum (massive stars tend to be blue and short-lived), while in infrared wavebands, for example, spiral arms only appear as mild over-densities of 10-20%.

Some galaxies have clear arms winding for almost 360$^\circ$ or even more (grand-design spirals), but most spirals arms much are shorter and less clear. Many galaxies in fact have only so-called flocculent spiral arms, which look like short pieces of spiral arms all over the galaxy, but which cannot be linked together into one large coherent spiral pattern.

The situation for the Milky is not so clear, as we don't have an external view and measuring accurate distances to objects within the Milky Way is notoriously difficult. The hope is that ESA's Gaia satellite will give us some more accurate picture.

share|improve this answer

I enjoyed this short video yesterday, by Sixty Symbols :

What makes spiral arms in some galaxies - and what is "pattern speed'? Professor Mike Merrifield explains.

share|improve this answer
Hi, @xdze2 Welcome to Astronomy Stack Exchange. While your answer provides good information, we typically want more than a link with basic interpretation. Your answer probably isn't in danger of being down-voted, but adding some more information would help it. – HDE 226868 Sep 1 '14 at 19:30
xdze2, you need to bring some of the content of the linked video into your post to make it a valid answer. Stack Exchange is not made for merely sharing links as answers--this is not useful to our users because of link rot, but we also want this site to be the place where you can actually find the answer whereas links are for resources and additional information. If you did not intend to answer the question, then I will convert this answer into a comment. – called2voyage Sep 2 '14 at 16:17
Hi, I am ok to convert my post to a comment, I am not a specialist about galaxies. – xdze2 Sep 2 '14 at 19:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.