Take the 2-minute tour ×
Astronomy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for astronomers and astrophysicists. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I was Googling about the oldest galaxies in the Universe. Everywhere is written that their age is known by the light. Referring to this line "Since light travels at a set speed, if you look at a star ten light years away, you're really seeing what it looked like ten years ago" on this site.

So my question is, as we know light is continuous, how do scientists know that a particular ray has started its journey some 1000 light years back? How is the age of stars determined?

share|improve this question
I think you're confusing at least two things - the age of a star, and the time it took its light to arrive on Earth. The first tells how long ago a star was formed, the latter how far away it is. –  AstroFloyd Nov 17 '13 at 13:58
Also, what do you mean with 'oldest galaxies'? We see the galaxies that are farthest away from us while they are still very young, since their light took about the age of the universe to reach us. In contrast, we see nearby galaxies while they're old, since their light only took a few million years to get here. Yet, both are about equally old (formed at roughly the same time after the Big Bang). –  AstroFloyd Nov 17 '13 at 14:04
@AstroFloyd you said light only took a few million years to get here how can we determine which light is from which galaxy. –  SpringLearner Nov 18 '13 at 3:22
Galaxies outside our own can be visually distinguished quite easily, given the right optical equipment. See the deep field images from Hubble. –  Mitch Goshorn May 15 '14 at 2:42
@MitchGoshorn Thanks for the link –  SpringLearner May 15 '14 at 2:56

4 Answers 4

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Scientists look at groups of stars to determine the ages. As another poster already said, the HR diagram is the tool used to determine ages. The colors emitted from the stars is also used to determine ages because color is indicative of where the star is on its life cycle.

How to Learn a Star's True Age

As the article says, stars are assessed by clusters. The stars formed around the same time and from there scientists determine the age. We have the following going on: brightness, color, and clusters. Size can be used as a determinant, however there are white dwarf stars which are very small, are dim as observed from Earth, yet are very old stars.

Also to clarify-- just because a star is far away and therefore can take thousands of light years for the light to reach is does not mean it's old. The speed of light is simply a measurement of time of travel.

share|improve this answer
Sorry, but color has very little to do with current age, only potential age. Most of the rest is correct, but that one mistake completely undermines the validity of your answer. –  Donald.McLean Nov 19 '13 at 22:30
@fractal21 Are you trying to describe the main sequence cut-off approach of determining the age of a population of stars? –  astromax Nov 21 '13 at 4:18

The most straightforward approach is to use a so-called Hertzsprung-Russell diagram: stars of a given mass "burn" in a fairly predictable way, so by looking at a star's spectrum and luminosity one can infer its possible age.


Wikipedia also has an overview of some additional methods:


share|improve this answer

fractal21 and user16653 are more or less right, but not completely.

What you use with a cluster of stars is an isocrone, a line theoretically calculated that gives you where in the HR diagram the stars of a given age are depending on their mass. This can be done because bigger stars start moving on the HR diagram earlier than smaller ones when they became supergiants.

So what we astrophysicists do is to compare a set of isocrones with the HR diagram of a cluster, and we assign to that cluster the age of the best fitting isocrone.

share|improve this answer

Measuring the ages of stars is an incredibly difficult process. It is not something that can be summarised adequately in an SE answer. Please take a look at these references.

Soderblom et al. (2013); Jeffries (2014).

Methods split into -

Fundamental - e.g. radioisotope dating - only possible for the Sun

Semi-fundamental - kinematic traceback of stars to their birthplace; observing the depletion of lithium in a star.

Model-dependent - comparing the luminosity and temperature (and composition) of a star with that predicted by stellar evolutionary models. Or equivalently, its surface gravity and temperature.

Empirical - looking at how things like rotation and magnetic activity decline with age and using this to estimate the age of a star.

Statistical - using the metallicity of galactic space motions of a star to provide a (crude) estimate of its age.

There is also a lot more detail given in this SE answer. Without using absolute magnitudes or isochrones, how might we tell a star's age and evolutionary status?

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.