18 reputation
6
bio website
location
age
visits member for 5 months
seen Jun 28 at 13:47

I aspire to be an astronomer/astrophysicist/computer scientist. I love to submit my ideas to people and hope that they read them.

I think in an abstract manner and can easily relate things to other things.


Sep
24
awarded  Autobiographer
Jun
24
revised Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
edited title
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
BTW don't be confused - I have changed my name. Will try to submit my work to New Scientist!
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
Thanks, I'll see what I can do.
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
What I mean is that the HR diagram - and indeed, any heavily revised work - fits its ORIGINAL purpose. But additional purposes were added. These new purposes were not compatible, but this does not mean that the original diagram is not vaild.
Jun
24
awarded  Supporter
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
Oh yeah, almost forgot - how should I publish this? I've already been in touch with the Institute of Physics and they know about it - but where else can I go? (BTW I upvoted your answer. :))
Jun
24
awarded  Student
Jun
24
awarded  Editor
Jun
24
awarded  Scholar
Jun
24
accepted Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
Jun
24
revised Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
Revised arguments
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
Edited post for below reason.
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
Ah, I didn't word it right... The HR diagram fits it purpose, but extra purposes have been attributed to it and some of these purposes don't fit it. But thanks; I appreciate it. (I can't upvote this right now; I wish I could but I don't have enough reputation).
Jun
24
comment Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)
But then if it is only true of the main sequence, then what about other stars like red giants, supergiants and the aforementioned RV Tauri stars?
Jun
23
awarded  Teacher
Jun
23
asked Is there a flaw with the newer purposes and correlations attributed to the HR diagram? (And would a third axis of mass correct the enclosed flaw?)