Reputation
1,409
Top tag
Next privilege 1,500 Rep.
Approve tag wiki edits
Badges
5 15
Newest
 Yearling
Impact
~7k people reached

Jan
21
comment Identify this object
Do you know enough about the characteristics of the telescope and camera to estimate the angular size of the object? Can you estimate more precisely when and where you took the photo, and where in the sky the scope was pointing at the time?
Jan
21
comment Is there a ninth planet?
They've found evidence of it, but they haven't confirmed it.
Jan
18
revised The relation of the lit side of the moon and the sun
added 67 characters in body
Jan
18
comment The relation of the lit side of the moon and the sun
I've edited the question, changing "blit" to "lit". nikolaos, if this isn't what you meant please edit the question again.
Jan
18
revised The relation of the lit side of the moon and the sun
Fix typos
Jan
17
comment How Are Radioactive Decay Rates Influenced by Neutrinos - On Earth and Other Dense Planets
Somebody should repeat the experiment in a controlled underground environment.
Jan
17
comment The relation of the lit side of the moon and the sun
@pela: I think I know what the OP is asking. See my answer.
Jan
17
answered The relation of the lit side of the moon and the sun
Jan
4
comment Why aren't new stars in Earth's relative proximity constantly discovered?
" ... the link I provided above ..." -- Please include that link in your answer.
Dec
21
comment Can a star have a ring system?
Most or all of the planetary ring systems we know about are within the planet's Roche limit. A star could have a ring of debris within its Roche limit, but it would probably be destroyed fairly quickly by light pressure and stellar wind. (The asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt as far outside the Sun's Roche limit.)
Dec
16
answered At what rate are stars accelerating?
Dec
16
comment At what rate are stars accelerating?
The question was about the rate of expansion. You haven't addressed that.
Nov
27
comment Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
@TheVoid: I don't see how their color relates to their trajectory. As we've said, light pressure would have no significant effect on the motion of a brown dwarf.
Nov
27
comment Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
@userLTK: Thank you for the corrections. I've updated my answer accordingly.
Nov
27
revised Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
Clarify: Mass not size, some fusion
Nov
26
comment Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
Would the downvoter care to explain?
Nov
26
revised Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
Spelling, grammar
Nov
26
comment Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
@TheVoid: I don't think there's anything to explain. As far as I know there's nothing unusual about the trajectories that brown dwarfs follow -- and plenty of stars and even planet-like bodies follow independent trajectories through space (though we're only just beginning to be able to detect rogue planets). Even if there were something unusual, neither light pressure nor magnetic fields would be a plausible explanation.
Nov
26
answered Plausible? Brown Dwarfs are rogue celestial bodies because they absorb all light due to their thick layer of matte black soot
Nov
26
comment Brown Dwarf transcending past the sun with the naked eye
This does not answer the question. It might if you said something about the photo, particularly what it is.