12
$\begingroup$

After Pluto's demotion as a planet, we have currently eight planets in our solar system. But Sun's gravitational pull can be felt well beyond Pluto, so is it possible to have a ninth planet beyond Pluto? I asked this question because we have Kuiper belt beyond Pluto, so there might be some Kuiper belt object which may qualified to be a ninth planet, isn't it possible?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
8
$\begingroup$

According to Caltech there is possibly a planet 10 times the mass of earth in a 15-20 thousand year orbit at an odd angle. It hasn't been observed yet. There's a search for it ongoing.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ They've found evidence of it, but they haven't confirmed it. $\endgroup$
    – Keith Thompson
    Jan 21, 2016 at 2:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There's potentially a planet. It is not certain yet. $\endgroup$
    – Ellesedil
    Jan 21, 2016 at 4:03
4
$\begingroup$

There could well be, since when we had nine planets we were looking for planet X (planet number 10). However, the modern day designation of a planet is: "is massive enough for its own gravity to make it roughly spherical (slight "oblate-ness"), and has "cleared its neighbourhood" of smaller objects around its orbit". Hence, we would more than likely discard anything far out such as Pluto because it would belong to either the Kuiper belt or the Oort cloud. Anything further out than Neptune would likely be considered a Dwarf planet or proto-planet.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$
3
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ Addendum: There are 5 officially recognised dwarf planets in our solar system, they are Ceres, Pluto, Haumea, Makemake and Eris. So there are plenty of interesting objects in our Solar System other than the 8 planets. $\endgroup$
    – MichaelJRoberts
    Nov 2, 2015 at 15:40
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ If there were a body the size of, say, Neptune or larger in the far outer solar system that hadn't "cleared its neighborhood", I suspect it would prompt another update to the definition of "planet". $\endgroup$
    – Keith Thompson
    Nov 2, 2015 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ I'd imagine so too. But it was a nice way of excluding objects within the asteroid belt (i.e., Ceres) that could be considered to be spheroidal in shape. However, I would state that Ceres is a proto-planet in these sense that at some point very far in the future it would probably coalesce with its neighbourhood through multiple collisions. $\endgroup$
    – MichaelJRoberts
    Nov 2, 2015 at 20:34

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .