18
$\begingroup$

A naive question. When we look at Jupiter, we see that its features didn't change largely over many years, for instance, the red-spot. If it is composed of gases and liquids, then why aren't the effects of mixing of these fluids visible?

My intuition is that due to very low temperatures ($-145\, ^{\circ}$C), diffusion of fluids doesn't occur and therefore the superficial appearence of Jupiter remains the same.

$\endgroup$
10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's been around for over 4 billion years - why would you expect it not to have collapsed into some basic pattern in that time? $\endgroup$
    – corsiKa
    Oct 29, 2014 at 14:45
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Faulty question. It does change. Have you not ever looked at it? $\endgroup$ Oct 29, 2014 at 18:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It changes all the time, and as long as you have a very good telescope (or access to the images posted by NASA) you can watch this. Very visible fluid dynamics! $\endgroup$
    – Rory Alsop
    Nov 5, 2014 at 10:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Voted to close - as Brian commented, this question is faulty. $\endgroup$
    – Rory Alsop
    Nov 5, 2014 at 10:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Juka I'm not sure what you expect from questions. Given how short some of your own posts are, I think you're holding others to a double standard. $\endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    Nov 6, 2014 at 15:38

4 Answers 4

27
$\begingroup$

Believe it or not, Jupiter isn't too consistent. Take a look at these pictures, the first taken in 2009 and the second taken in 2010:

enter image description here

and

enter image description here

Quite the difference, eh? Why?

Jupiter's atmosphere is made of zones and belts. Zones are colder and are composed of rising gases; they are dark-colored. Belts are warmer and are composed of falling gases; they are light-colored. The reason the two don't intermix is because of constant flows of wind, similar to the Jetstream. These winds make it hard for bands to mix.

There are two types of explanations for the jets. Shallow models say that the jets are caused by local disturbances. Deep models say that they are the byproduct of rotating cylinders comprising the mantle. At the moment, we don't know which explanation is correct.

$\endgroup$
6
  • 6
    $\begingroup$ How do you know that both pictures are of the same side of Jupiter? It rotates rather quickly. $\endgroup$ Oct 29, 2014 at 19:05
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @NateEldredge Well they're rotated similarly enough to not include the great red spot at least. $\endgroup$ Oct 29, 2014 at 19:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Voyager 1 made a timelapse of the surface. For example: youtube.com/watch?v=rHwkdcppsuo $\endgroup$
    – Sanchises
    Oct 29, 2014 at 19:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Here's a video of the same side of Jupiter, as Voyager approaches. They do some processing to make the image the same size, and some tweening, so it's not "pure", but it makes it obvious that the details do not remain static. youtube.com/watch?v=l-9ULWGHFD0 $\endgroup$
    – Beska
    Oct 29, 2014 at 19:37
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @NateEldredge Jupiter, like the sun and the other gas planets, undergoes differential rotation; for two photos separated by many days, Jupiter doesn't have well-defined "sides" like rocky planets do. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Oct 29, 2014 at 20:39
14
$\begingroup$

we see that its features didn't change largely over many years

Jupiter is huge. It is 11 earths across, and 1300 times our volume. The clouds/bands we can see are vastly larger than Earth's entire ecosystem and that means they have a lot more inertia.

Also consider our observation timespan. We have been watching Jupiter* for under 2 centuries, watching it in detail for under 60 years, and watching it in the above picture's detail for under 30 years. Given the scale of Jupiter's weather this is a very short timespan and we should not expect to see major upheavals within one human lifespan. Picture a nice summer day in California, from an insect's perspective - it won't change much in 72 hours, and that's a long time for many bugs.

  • Galileo saw a spot of light. Cassini (the person, not the probe) didn't see all that much detail.
$\endgroup$
3
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ "Galileo saw a spot of light". Best understatement of a great discovery ever. Good points all around. $\endgroup$
    – HDE 226868
    Oct 29, 2014 at 14:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Great discoveries often have unassuming appearances. That's what makes them great discoveries. $\endgroup$
    – paul
    Oct 30, 2014 at 11:10
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ @HDE226868 galileo saw 4 spots of light around that one big one, and thats why we call io europa ganymede and callisto the galilean moons of jupiter. $\endgroup$ Nov 5, 2014 at 5:48
4
$\begingroup$

Jupiter is highly dynamic:

Jupiter Animated Video Gallery (be sure to look at storm merger video)

Differences Spotted in Jupiter's Big Red Storms

Jupiter's New Red Spot

Jupiter Loses Big Belt; Great Spot Left Hanging

The persistence of Jupiter's Red spot is in fact a bit of a mystery.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Jupiter's features change constantly, thanks to new leaps in the field of Astronomy, i.e Hubble, Spitzer and soon to come in 2018 the James Web telescope, we have been able to see our Universe in ways never imagined. July 1994, when more than 20 pieces of Comet P/Shoemaker-Levy 9 (SL9) plunged into Jupiter's atmosphere it caused a flash of energy bright enough to be seen 400 million miles away. A shock wave generated by ram pressure as the meteor speeds into the planet's atmosphere heats the impacting body to a very high temperature, and as the hot object streaks through the atmosphere, it leaves behind a glowing trail of superheated atmospheric gases and vaporized meteor material, leaving dark smudges behind that rapidly cools and fades in just a few seconds.Therefore changing its atmosphere if only briefly. For more info on Jupiter visit http://ccs.infospace.com/

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Jupiter of all the planents DOES CHANGE! It may not appear to be such, but the small changes are there, most seen to be suddle $\endgroup$ Nov 4, 2014 at 22:01

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .