Timeline for Claim that 30-m class telescopes will have resolution far superior to Hubble: true?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2023 at 13:07 | answer | added | caInstrument | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 12, 2023 at 12:41 | history | edited | ProfRob |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 26, 2021 at 10:27 | history | edited | B--rian |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 7, 2018 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1071147454379290625 | ||
| Dec 7, 2018 at 17:33 | answer | added | Smills | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 14, 2015 at 2:21 | vote | accept | NeutronStar | ||
| May 11, 2015 at 21:32 | answer | added | ProfRob | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 11, 2015 at 3:25 | answer | added | Conrad Turner | timeline score: 5 | |
| May 10, 2015 at 20:11 | comment | added | ProfRob | Lucky imaging is of course always possible, but I think doesn't work so well for a very large aperture. | |
| May 10, 2015 at 20:10 | comment | added | ProfRob | Yes, it is because diffraction limited imaging using adaptive optics is becoming possible. This is currently very difficult in the visible, so possibly like is not being compared with like. | |
| May 10, 2015 at 17:34 | history | asked | NeutronStar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |