Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 28, 2021 at 11:27 history edited uhoh
edited tags
May 25, 2016 at 14:56 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/735484597119688704
May 25, 2016 at 3:35 vote accept Sir Cumference
May 24, 2016 at 19:02 comment added Sir Cumference @dmckee Considering the immense gravity of a neutron star, I simply didn't see how a gas could possibly surround it.
May 24, 2016 at 18:30 comment added dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten So it seems less absurd that there should be a completely abrupt transition from a degenerate fluid to vacuum with nothing in between? No transition region at all? Really?
May 24, 2016 at 13:32 vote accept Sir Cumference
May 24, 2016 at 13:32
May 24, 2016 at 13:29 answer added ProfRob timeline score: 12
May 24, 2016 at 13:20 comment added userLTK As a source: chandra.harvard.edu/press/09_releases/press_110409.html Hydrogen and Helium fuse on the surface to make Carbon. "Atmosphere" might be a bit vague, it's probably more of a dense, nearly solid plasma. . . . but I'm guessing.
May 24, 2016 at 13:16 comment added Sir Cumference @RobJeffries Yeah, made a mistake by saying "large". I meant the small gaseous atmospheres surrounding neutron stars.
May 24, 2016 at 13:16 comment added ProfRob What do you mean by large atmospheres? If you mean the magnetospheres, well the clue is in the name. Gravity is not the only force acting.
May 24, 2016 at 13:16 history edited Sir Cumference CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 24, 2016 at 13:15 comment added Sir Cumference @userLTK It still seems absurd that matter so close to the star will be gaseous.
May 24, 2016 at 13:15 comment added userLTK 4 inch thick atmospheres. :-)
May 24, 2016 at 12:32 history asked Sir Cumference CC BY-SA 3.0