Timeline for white-dwarf merge in binaries
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10, 2016 at 12:37 | history | edited | questionhang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 22 characters in body
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 17:47 | history | edited | zephyr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixing latex and formatting
|
| Nov 7, 2016 at 14:12 | answer | added | Ken G | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 14:00 | comment | added | questionhang | @sir yes, in binaries. | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 13:19 | comment | added | Sir Cumference | @questionhang I guess you're referring to the latter? | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 4:26 | comment | added | questionhang | @ltk I have revised the title. A 0.5 wd+ 1.4ns should be common. | |
| Nov 7, 2016 at 4:23 | history | edited | questionhang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 6, 2016 at 17:35 | comment | added | userLTK | Are you talking direct hit collisions or the more gradual, tight orbit, gradual collisions as they spin around each other thousands of times. The 2nd type of collision is far more common. | |
| Nov 6, 2016 at 14:52 | history | asked | questionhang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |