Timeline for On gravitational wave radiation and arrangement of galaxies post- big bang
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2016 at 18:36 | comment | added | HDE 226868♦ | @NaveenBalaji Well, yes, but nowhere near orbits where $e\approx1$. | |
| Dec 6, 2016 at 18:32 | comment | added | Spoilt Milk | @HDE226868 But aren't they elliptical at some point of the orbital lifetime? | |
| Dec 6, 2016 at 18:23 | comment | added | HDE 226868♦ | It's not at all true that objects in the Solar System originally had highly elliptical orbits. That contradicts everything we know about planet formation, both observationally and theoretically. | |
| Dec 4, 2016 at 3:04 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 9, 2016 at 23:35 | |||||
| Nov 25, 2016 at 10:29 | answer | added | kubanczyk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 19:31 | comment | added | Spoilt Milk | @JamesK I have added some results to explain what I meant by those statements, and also changed the question a bit as what I wanted to ask was not conveyed properly in the previous edit. | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 19:29 | history | edited | Spoilt Milk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Huge edits of mathematical equations and questions
|
| Nov 24, 2016 at 19:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 25, 2016 at 12:23 | |||||
| Nov 24, 2016 at 18:47 | comment | added | James K | I'm having difficulty understanding this question. I don't follow the reasoning that leads to "orbits become more and more elliptical and eventually become a straight line". The release of gravitational radiation is not a significant factor in the formation and evolution of the solar system. And I don't understand how you conclude that "the spread of matter happened along a line". This seems to be a complete non-sequitor | |
| Nov 24, 2016 at 17:25 | history | edited | Spoilt Milk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 23, 2016 at 12:09 | history | asked | Spoilt Milk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |