Timeline for Why didn't the Big Bang produce heavier elements?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2018 at 19:51 | vote | accept | Sir Cumference | ||
| Dec 14, 2016 at 13:03 | history | protected | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 16:43 | comment | added | DavePhD | also: physics.stackexchange.com/questions/105405/… | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 9:39 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/808607375167025152 | ||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 8:34 | comment | added | ProfRob | The answers are complementary to this one in some ways. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 8:31 | comment | added | Sir Cumference | @RobJeffries Yeah, I feel a bit dumb... | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 8:29 | comment | added | ProfRob | Google search: first result physics.stackexchange.com/questions/199632/… | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 5:27 | vote | accept | Sir Cumference | ||
| Mar 2, 2018 at 19:51 | |||||
| Dec 13, 2016 at 3:24 | answer | added | zephyr | timeline score: 38 | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 2:47 | comment | added | LaserYeti | It isn't the 100% best explanation to your question (maybe 86%), but check out this paper for a pretty solid reasoning as to the abundances, and restrictions of the primordial elements. | |
| Dec 13, 2016 at 2:35 | history | asked | Sir Cumference | CC BY-SA 3.0 |