Timeline for Has a “white hole” theory been advanced to explain anomalous star formation in Sagittarius A?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2019 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1165005962513649664 | ||
| Aug 23, 2019 at 16:09 | comment | added | Edouard | I have to add that even my own caveat that EC theory is "not renormalizable" was based on a statement, in the Wikipedia page at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein%E2%80%93Cartan_theory, which someone has since removed. (The page is currently unchallenged.) | |
| Aug 23, 2019 at 15:57 | comment | added | Edouard | @ Joshua I appreciate your making a comment, and I'm assuming you're saying that Poplawski's BH-to-WH bounce model is not compatible with mainstream physics, but could you please be a little more specific as to how it falls short? He's had about 10 related papers out between 2009 and 2019, and he's the physics chair at the University of New Haven. (I know such a bounce is usually considered very improbable, but at least one of those papers says there may be a local universe in every BH: Is that the stretch you might be objecting to?) | |
| Aug 23, 2019 at 15:48 | history | edited | Edouard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Minor grammatical correction in last sentence of 3rd paragraph, noticed while responding to a comment.
|
| Aug 22, 2019 at 15:07 | comment | added | Joshua | First we need a non-physics-breaking model of a white hole. | |
| S Mar 20, 2018 at 20:03 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo corrected
|
| Mar 20, 2018 at 19:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 20, 2018 at 20:03 | |||||
| Mar 17, 2018 at 16:11 | vote | accept | Edouard | ||
| Mar 17, 2018 at 15:46 | history | edited | Edouard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Adding remark--from a post subsequently deleted--to make sense out of comment to answerer.
|
| Mar 15, 2018 at 11:10 | answer | added | Peter Erwin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 18:21 | comment | added | Edouard | @ Kozaky--the complete link you were wanting is arxiv.org/abs/1510.08834 | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 17:49 | comment | added | Edouard | @ Kozaky-there have been problems with what's called "link rot", so you may need to Google search the paper by its title, which is "Non-parametric reconstruction of an inflaton potential". The reason why I threw in the 2nd paragraph is that I thought (probably naively) that ASE staffers might actually be e-mailing or calling the ESO, and could simply put the question about rotational direction to its staffers. "Cosmology" is really the more important tag, but the site had its own rule (possibly alphabetic) for sequencing them. | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 17:35 | comment | added | Edouard | @ HDE 226868-remember that the original study, upon which further research was needed, had lasted 16 years, not just 10. (16 years, incidentally, was all the time the fastest of the 6 stars in the disc of orbits had taken to orbit the galactic center!) | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 17:26 | comment | added | Edouard | @ Kozaky-here's the link-"arXiv:1510.08834'"-you might have to copy it and paste it. | |
| Mar 13, 2018 at 17:25 | history | undeleted | Edouard | ||
| Mar 12, 2018 at 19:40 | history | deleted | Edouard | via Vote | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 18:50 | history | edited | James K | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 12, 2018 at 16:46 | comment | added | HDE 226868♦ | It's worth noting that the article you link to is ten years old, and likely not representative of the current state of knowledge of the area. | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 16:38 | comment | added | user10106 | Is there an actual link for: 'arXiv.org > astro-ph > arXiv:1510.08834'? And where does a "white hole" theory relate to your second paragraph? | |
| Mar 12, 2018 at 16:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 12, 2018 at 19:40 | |||||
| Mar 12, 2018 at 16:12 | history | asked | Edouard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |