Timeline for Math behind a uv plot in interferometry?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2019 at 10:22 | comment | added | juandesant | Assuming L is latitude (positive in the northern hemisphere), and D is declination, the other thing to take into account is that on the northern hemisphere, the uv coverage for a source at D declination is identical to that at -D declination… minus the horizon occlusions at when (L+D)<-90… (assuming D keeps the sign). | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 15:53 | comment | added | uhoh | I hadn't realized that I hadn't accepted this. I'd probably planned to do so right after "taking it for a spin" but I haven't done so yet. | |
| Jun 18, 2018 at 15:52 | vote | accept | uhoh | ||
| May 31, 2018 at 0:28 | comment | added | uhoh | This is excellent! It's concise, clear, thorough, well-sourced, and mathematical; exactly what I needed, thank you! I'll take it for a spin. By the way, I have several more Radio Astronomy questions that still need answers: astronomy.stackexchange.com/… | |
| May 30, 2018 at 21:13 | history | answered | Mike G | CC BY-SA 4.0 |