Timeline for How is information preserved on the surface of a Black Hole?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
18 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2021 at 0:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1356391891856719876 | ||
| Jan 30, 2021 at 1:03 | answer | added | The_Sympathizer | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 29, 2021 at 23:29 | history | edited | B--rian | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Making the title a readable question, and deleting the question from the main text.
|
| Nov 18, 2019 at 17:05 | vote | accept | Endre Moen | ||
| Jan 14, 2019 at 8:58 | comment | added | Endre Moen | @peterh - your right. My training is in math and computer science - and math is continuous and spacetime is continuous - until plank length. So plank length is a limit. Does there exist a (complex and dense) object that disproves the holographic principle because of the plank length limit - or does there exist a limit to how complex and dense 3d objects can be? Or can the information transformation from 3D to 2D take place without considering preconditions because everything is continouse? To me - plank length seems to set a limit to continouity. | |
| Jan 14, 2019 at 8:30 | history | edited | Endre Moen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 57 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2019 at 8:27 | vote | accept | Endre Moen | ||
| Jan 14, 2019 at 8:27 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2019 at 23:56 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | I disagree, but that's okay. | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 23:33 | comment | added | Chappo Hasn't Forgotten | @RoryAlsop This looks like a question about astrophysics to me, which is on topic. There is no justification for closure, and as it has an answer, it's now a useful addition to our site library. | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 22:02 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | @jan - I had a look at that, and this one feels very much in the theoretical space, so that doesn't apply. | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 21:15 | comment | added | user1569 | @Rory I thought we'd stop doing that? astronomy.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/450/… | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 17:02 | answer | added | John Duffield | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 15:00 | comment | added | peterh | Your question seems to have a strong digital influence with discrete things. Current physics see the world as completely analogous on the deepest level we know (and indeterministic). There is no problem with information compression, in an analogous world you can compress any signal by decreasing the length of the coordinates. Also I feel that it can't happen over any limit; but it is just my feeling, as far I know the spacetime seems to be continuous at least until the plank length ($\approx 10^{-41} m$). | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 14:10 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 13, 2019 at 23:34 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2019 at 13:54 | comment | added | Rory Alsop | I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because while a black hole is an astronomical object, this query is theoretical physics-based | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 10:30 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | Have you read en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bekenstein_bound ? | |
| Jan 13, 2019 at 8:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 13, 2019 at 10:44 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2019 at 8:33 | history | asked | Endre Moen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |