Skip to main content
19 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 25, 2019 at 1:22 comment added draw134 Thank you for your answers sirs !!
Oct 25, 2019 at 1:19 comment added Mazura Ammonia, methane and hydrogen are flammable gasses, but combustion (fire, aka: oxidation) requires fuel and an oxidizer. That's why the candle goes out when you put the lid on; it quickly uses up all the remaining oxidizer (oxygen), while there's plenty of fuel left (wax). - The fuel must be vaporized (or hot enough to vaporize) or be a gas : "In this [gaseous] state they can then readily react with oxygen in the air, which gives off enough heat in the subsequent exothermic reaction to vaporize yet more fuel, thus sustaining a consistent flame."
Oct 24, 2019 at 4:12 comment added Max0815 This has been asked in Worldbuilding StackExchange, but nevertheless i believe valuable here too.
Oct 21, 2019 at 20:59 comment added Eric Lippert You might consider reading up on the chemistry of reduction/oxidation reactions. Burning is oxidation, and oxidation by definition requires that you move some electrons around. Moving electrons implies that they start somewhere and then end up somewhere else. So the thing to figure out when you're trying to burn a big pile of hydrogen is: where are the necessary electrons coming from? On Earth when we burn hydrogen the electrons come along with the oxygen, but there is no oxygen on Neptune.
Oct 21, 2019 at 16:00 review Close votes
Oct 24, 2019 at 4:13
Oct 21, 2019 at 15:44 comment added Carl Witthoft There's a nice Asimov's Mysteries story about this situation. Anyway, the point is that you can't get flame aka oxidation without two agents -- not to mention that you can't "throw fire" -- you can only throw energy in the form of hot reagents or photons.
Oct 21, 2019 at 15:09 comment added James Besides the good answer you have, I'll add that if a planet did contain flammable gas AND an oxidizing agent then it would have already burned. For example, a small meteorite would act as the trigger.
Oct 21, 2019 at 3:46 comment added Rich There are such things as monopropellants that burn (e.g. decompose exothermically) without a separate oxidiser - all the ones I can think of are liquids, require a catalyst, or both. You could have an atmosphere of FOOF, but it would need to be very cold...
S Oct 21, 2019 at 2:02 history edited Chappo Hasn't Forgotten CC BY-SA 4.0
fixes to title and text - improved the English expression
S Oct 21, 2019 at 2:02 history suggested Mark Rogers CC BY-SA 4.0
fixes to title and text
Oct 20, 2019 at 18:49 review Suggested edits
S Oct 21, 2019 at 2:02
Oct 20, 2019 at 18:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1185979143038652416
Oct 20, 2019 at 2:34 history became hot network question
Oct 20, 2019 at 0:15 comment added uhoh @Vince your right, cryogenic, liquified ammonia has even been used as a fuel to fly the X-15 into space! But it also carried cryogenic, liquified oxygen (LOX) as well, and that's the basis of JamesK's answer. The chemical process of oxidation (burning) doesn't require actual oxygen, but it does require some oxidizing agent, and oxygen is a relatively good one. Put a small glass jar over a candle and it burns for a few seconds then goes out. Why? no fresh supply of oxidizer.
Oct 19, 2019 at 19:22 vote accept draw134
Oct 19, 2019 at 19:21 answer added James K timeline score: 29
Oct 19, 2019 at 19:16 comment added draw134 what do you mean by that sir? Can you explain to me in the answer? And as far as i know ammonia and methane and hydrogen are flamamble
Oct 19, 2019 at 18:45 comment added BillDOe Most likely the flame would be extinguished due a lack of oxidizing agent.
Oct 19, 2019 at 18:31 history asked draw134 CC BY-SA 4.0