Skip to main content
Astronomy

Return to Answer

deleted 45 characters in body
Source Link
James K
James K
  • 128.8k
  • 6
  • 327
  • 449

Rudolf Minkowski.

Its not likely to be the mathematician, Hermann. Nor the physiologist Oskar. There's only one Minkowski who was an observational astronomer.

The paper describing M1-92 was https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/125855 (its the 92 object in table 1 of that paper)

The 2006 paper on Minkowski's object (Croft et al) cites Minkowski, R. 1958, PASP, 70, 143

Rudolf Minkowski.

Its not likely to be the mathematician, Hermann. Nor the physiologist Oskar. There's only one Minkowski who was an observational astronomer.

The paper describing M1-92 was https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/125855 (its the 92 object in table 1 of that paper)

The 2006 paper on Minkowski's object (Croft et al) cites Minkowski, R. 1958, PASP, 70, 143

Rudolf Minkowski.

Its not likely to be the mathematician, Hermann. Nor the physiologist Oskar. There's only one Minkowski who was an observational astronomer.

The paper describing M1-92 was https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/125855

The 2006 paper on Minkowski's object (Croft et al) cites Minkowski, R. 1958, PASP, 70, 143

Source Link
James K
James K
  • 128.8k
  • 6
  • 327
  • 449

Rudolf Minkowski.

Its not likely to be the mathematician, Hermann. Nor the physiologist Oskar. There's only one Minkowski who was an observational astronomer.

The paper describing M1-92 was https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1086/125855 (its the 92 object in table 1 of that paper)

The 2006 paper on Minkowski's object (Croft et al) cites Minkowski, R. 1958, PASP, 70, 143