Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 13, 2020 at 12:10 answer added ProfRob timeline score: 4
Aug 13, 2020 at 10:20 history edited CGHA
edited tags
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:42 comment added CGHA is applicable to the equation*
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:36 comment added CGHA Distance Modulus only takes the Apparent "Visual" Magnitude (using our eyes)...the V-band data is basically a standard passband on the "Visual spectrum" (using CCDs/DSLRs) and I don't think that the V-band optical photometry isn't applicable to the equation.
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:26 comment added planetmaker For my understanding of your question: you have V-band photometry data on the star - but you are concerned that you cannot use it to derive a magnitude and subsequently a luminosity? Where is the difference between the brightness derived from V-band data and the visual magnitude? Thx for the hint with 'Alf' = Alpha. One never stops to learn, though this curls my nails ;)
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:21 comment added CGHA but yep, it is pretty much standard tho. c: Kinda seems strange at first.
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:19 history edited CGHA CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 4 characters in body
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:19 comment added user24157 @planetmaker - "alf" is pretty standard, e.g. SIMBAD uses it.
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:17 comment added CGHA ah yah it is a strange abbreviation haha (Even AAVSO and VSX does that). I should have indicated "a" instead lol. But I do not need distance at all since I do have the value for that. I think what matters most is to get the "L"..and getting the L through the optical standard passband is a little bit problematic for me C:
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:04 comment added planetmaker If you need a distance, it doesn't matter how it was derived as the object ultimately can only have one distance (it only matters for error estimates). Btw: Alf is a very strange abbreviation for alpha
Aug 13, 2020 at 7:50 review First posts
Aug 13, 2020 at 8:19
Aug 13, 2020 at 7:47 history asked CGHA CC BY-SA 4.0