Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 6, 2021 at 15:08 comment added Joseph Farah @SteveLinton the 1.2 meters was a typo--great catch! And thanks for the additional info on the camera, I've updated my answer to include it. The 64 cm spec is provided on the same page about the camera I cited for the statement before, so I didn't add an additional source. I've also included the unit conversion you suggested to truly make the answer a smorgasbord.
Jan 6, 2021 at 15:07 history edited Joseph Farah CC BY-SA 4.0
added 67 characters in body
Jan 6, 2021 at 15:06 comment added Steve Linton 64cm is about $4\times 10^{34}$ Planck lengths, incidentally
Jan 6, 2021 at 15:05 comment added Steve Linton Although the camera as a whole may be this size (1.2m is closer to 4 feet than 5 incidentally), the sensor array is 64cm across.
Jan 6, 2021 at 14:55 comment added Joseph Farah due purely to @pela 's charm, I have provided the weight estimate in dynes.
Jan 6, 2021 at 14:54 history edited Joseph Farah CC BY-SA 4.0
added 21 characters in body
Jan 6, 2021 at 8:50 comment added pela cgs please! you're an astronomer! ;-)
Jan 5, 2021 at 21:24 comment added Joseph Farah @ProfRob I chose the primary units I did in order to be consistent with the spec sheet provided by Vera Rubin Observatory (linked in answer). However, as a possible resolution, I have updated the answer with additional unit conversions to SI.
Jan 5, 2021 at 21:22 history edited Joseph Farah CC BY-SA 4.0
improving units
Jan 5, 2021 at 21:19 comment added ProfRob Can we choose SI or imperial units.
Jan 5, 2021 at 13:35 vote accept Ilya Gazman
Jan 5, 2021 at 10:07 history edited uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0
added 95 characters in body
Jan 5, 2021 at 1:42 review First posts
Jan 5, 2021 at 2:44
Jan 5, 2021 at 1:36 history answered Joseph Farah CC BY-SA 4.0