Timeline for Is it possible to use Photolithography for telescope image sensor?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2021 at 12:44 | history | bounty ended | Ilya Gazman | ||
| Jan 14, 2021 at 22:06 | history | edited | Steve Linton | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 412 characters in body
|
| Jan 14, 2021 at 21:03 | comment | added | Ilya Gazman | Can you please provide a mathematical formula for a reasonable pixel size compared to the wavelength of light and the lens's aperture diameter? | |
| Jan 11, 2021 at 14:20 | comment | added | Steve Linton | I don't know much about X-ray telescopes, but their resoution is probably limited by how accurately the X-rays reflect from the surface of the mirror, or by aligment of the multiple mirrors, rather than by diffraction. | |
| Jan 10, 2021 at 23:59 | comment | added | Peter Erwin | If by “effective size” you mean physical size, then for XMM-Newton it’s 40 micrometers. | |
| Jan 10, 2021 at 20:00 | comment | added | Ilya Gazman | Can you please tell me what would be the smallest effective size of a pixel in an x-ray telescope, for example, the XMM-Newton? | |
| Jan 10, 2021 at 13:14 | history | answered | Steve Linton | CC BY-SA 4.0 |