Timeline for Could we carve a large radio dish in the Antarctic ice?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2021 at 6:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1372427547472969728 | ||
| Mar 16, 2021 at 23:12 | vote | accept | Joe | ||
| S Mar 16, 2021 at 18:01 | history | suggested | Einsteinium | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I added some details, and improved some grammar
|
| Mar 16, 2021 at 17:44 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 16, 2021 at 18:01 | |||||
| Mar 16, 2021 at 7:17 | comment | added | user207421 | Surely the question is about making the dish itself out of ice? not building something on top of the ice? If so I would be worred about the heating effect of the radio waves that are being captured. | |
| S Mar 14, 2021 at 23:53 | history | suggested | CommunityBot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
put context from title in question
|
| Mar 14, 2021 at 23:42 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 14, 2021 at 23:53 | |||||
| Mar 14, 2021 at 20:49 | comment | added | Tim | @BrianDrake mostly focused on the neutrino detector google.co.uk/… | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 20:39 | answer | added | Paul Smith | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 12:29 | comment | added | uhoh | @BrianDrake with +7/-1 voting it seems that people felt that in this particular case the question was of a nature where a bit of research just for the sake of adding "evidence of research" just wasn't worth it or necessary. SE has very few absolute rules; sometimes a well-received question can simply be the title. It doesn't happen often but it does happen, and there's no rule against it. | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 12:24 | comment | added | Brian Drake | @uhoh Perhaps some “research effort”? | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 12:15 | answer | added | fraxinus | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 12:05 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 14, 2021 at 6:11 | comment | added | user45266 | Would be a good one for Worldbuilding, maybe? | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 3:10 | answer | added | uhoh | timeline score: 31 | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 2:21 | comment | added | uhoh | @fasterthanlight like what? If a question is clear then details are not necessary. There is no rule that questions must be at least X in length, It looks fine to me. | |
| Mar 14, 2021 at 1:26 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Mar 13, 2021 at 20:29 | comment | added | Joe | Seems easier to carve a very large telescope in a self supporting material. Also there is very little light pollution | |
| Mar 13, 2021 at 20:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 15, 2021 at 6:46 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2021 at 19:57 | comment | added | WarpPrime | Could you please add more details? | |
| Mar 13, 2021 at 17:47 | answer | added | James K | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 13, 2021 at 17:40 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Mar 13, 2021 at 23:35 | |||||
| Mar 13, 2021 at 17:27 | comment | added | Joe | I think there would be a small limit on the amount of sky observed with it being on one of the poles. | |
| Mar 13, 2021 at 17:25 | history | asked | Joe | CC BY-SA 4.0 |