Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 1, 2022 at 3:43 comment added uhoh @GregMiller see the "bias" section of my question. Were you able to ascertain from their talk what methods and methodologies they used to search, collect, and identify their meteorites? If they were looking for dark metallic chunks with a bit of surface melting, or using a metal detector or dragging magnets behind them, then we can quickly guess that their results are so low for that reason alone.
Sep 1, 2022 at 3:01 comment added Greg Miller From the way I've heard collectors talk, I'd put it at a fraction of a percent, for ones that are actually found.
Aug 31, 2022 at 21:00 history tweeted twitter.com/StackAstronomy/status/1565082013819965443
Aug 31, 2022 at 14:42 comment added IMSoP @Chenmunka That's what the footnote attempts to clarify: "practical" in the sense of "practical for someone to test without specialist equipment", as opposed to "chemically provable to exhibit zero magnetism".
Aug 31, 2022 at 14:29 comment added Chenmunka What do you mean by practical purposes - What practical purpose do you envisage a meteorite being put to?
Aug 31, 2022 at 12:57 comment added Carl Witthoft MIght be fun to extend this to all non-orbiting (the sun) objects for which we can estimate atomic content via remote (spectral, etc) analysis.
Aug 31, 2022 at 12:32 history asked uhoh CC BY-SA 4.0