Timeline for Why is the metallicity of dwarf galaxies low?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29 at 15:21 | vote | accept | Rich Jensen | ||
| Apr 28 at 11:39 | comment | added | Amazon Dies In Darkness | The "Astronomy Picture of the Day" today sent me down a rabbit-hole. Occasionally, they intentionally send you down a black hole: apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/1410/bhlens_riazuelo_2560.jpg | |
| Apr 28 at 10:52 | answer | added | ProfRob | timeline score: 16 | |
| Apr 28 at 0:10 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 27 at 21:55 | answer | added | 4NT4R3S | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 27 at 19:17 | comment | added | PM 2Ring | ... and primordial helium. | |
| Apr 27 at 18:46 | comment | added | antlersoft | Because the rate of star formation in dwarf galaxies is so low, there simply hasn't been time for many second- and third-generation stars, which have higher metallicity, to form. Almost all the stars were formed from the galaxies' initial complement of unadulterated primordial hydrogen. | |
| S Apr 27 at 16:10 | review | First questions | |||
| Apr 28 at 1:40 | |||||
| S Apr 27 at 16:10 | history | asked | Rich Jensen | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
