1
$\begingroup$

Metallicity decreases with the Galactocentric radius and height above the Galactic plane (Bergemann et al. 2014; Duong et al. 2018). https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/abs/2014/05/aa23456-14/aa23456-14.html

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Did you read the paper and follow up any of the references in it discussing that topic? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 2, 2023 at 11:31
  • $\begingroup$ The paper does not explain why metallicity decreases. It is a summary of how metallicity is distributed. Thanks to ProfRob I now have a better understanding of why. $\endgroup$
    – user52803
    Commented Nov 3, 2023 at 11:09

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

There's a combination of things going on.

Stars form in the disk and bulge of the Galaxy where most of the gas gathers. A lot of the chemical enrichment, particularly of "alpha elements" - Mg, Si, S, Ne then happens promptly (within 10-20 million years) from exploding core collapse supernovae. In such short lives, the progenitor massive stars have not moved far from their birth places, so the gas just gets more enriched in situ.

Iron-peak elements are formed mostly in type Ia supernovae. These exploding white dwarfs are older than the progenitors of core collapse supernovae and do migrate from their birth places. Nevertheless there is still some tendency for the enrichment to take place closer to the central bulge and Galactic plane and of course, gas that is above the Galactic plane tends to fall towards the Galactic plane in any case.

Stars that are found above the Galactic plane tend to be older, because the vertical speeds of stars are gradually increased by various tidal interactions during their lives. If they are older stars then they were formed from gas that was less enriched.

Very old, very metal poor stars may have formed before the gas disk formed and these are now more evenly, even spherically, distributed compared with "population I" stars in the disk.

The decrease with radius is again because if there are fewer progenitor stars being born at larger radius (the rate of star birth and the stellar density decreases with increasing radius) then there is less enrichment of the interstellar medium at larger radii.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Our solar system is vertically half way across the Galaxy and horizontally too. Where there is not too much and not too little metal presumably. $\endgroup$
    – user52681
    Commented Nov 2, 2023 at 22:23
  • $\begingroup$ Planet sizes are influenced by metallicity, so there should be more planets closer to the galactic centre that are large (high metallicity) and planets further out should generally be smaller ( low metallicity). $\endgroup$
    – user52681
    Commented Nov 2, 2023 at 22:59

You must log in to answer this question.