0
$\begingroup$

I would like to know how do astronomers estimate the mass of a star that has been ejected from its galaxy. What kind of accuracy can be achieved?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What is a "rogue star"? $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Mar 18 '16 at 7:49
  • $\begingroup$ @RobJeffries: I believe any star that is "kicked out" by their own galaxy gets demoted to rogue star. $\endgroup$ – user6760 Mar 18 '16 at 9:26
  • $\begingroup$ In that case the mass is estimated in the same way as any other star. You put it on an HR diagram and match it up with a stellar model. If the distance is unknown then you have to use the "spectroscopists" HR diagram by estimating the surface gravity to place it in the evolutionary lifecycle and then using the temperature to estimate the mass. $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Mar 18 '16 at 10:46
  • $\begingroup$ Closely related, and possibly a duplicate, astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/11342/… $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Mar 18 '16 at 10:47
  • $\begingroup$ I could provide a more detailed answer if you tell me exactly what the context is and what observational material might be available. $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Mar 18 '16 at 10:48
1
$\begingroup$

OK, I'll assume you are talking about this star or some other high-mass "runaway star".

Most massive stars are born in rich clusters and are often part of multiple system. Is not unusual for such stars to get ejected from these regions are high velocities, either as a result of dynamical interactions in multiple systems or when they are companions to stars that explode as supernovae.

The steps to estimate the mass are: (i) Obtain very detailed optical and UV spectroscopy. From this you estimate the spectral type of the star, it's effective temperature and its (current) mass-loss rate. (ii) You combine this with a known distance (the star in the link was in the Large Magellanic Cloud, so the distance was known fairly accurately) to estimate a luminosity. (iii) You compare the luminosity, temperature and mass-loss rate with the predictions of a specialised high-mass stellar evolutionary model, which includes mass-loss and rotation. The comparison yields an estimate of the mass and age of the star.

The details are found in Evans et al. (2010). It is probably fair to say that the estimate of $90\ M_{\odot}$, is uncertain by a few tens of solar masses.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.