0
$\begingroup$

Neutrino's are very small though they have mass. Because of that it is probably that the don't have a speed faster than photons.

But is it in all events, like supernova's or else events, where it is possible that we first receive their neutrino's instead of their light?

Perhaps gravity or other interactions could change something in their way to earth?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Supernovae are thought to emit neutrinos immediately, as the core collapses. Photons are emitted from the surface a short time after this. So, the neutrinos don't actually travel faster - they are just released first. $\endgroup$ – Andy Mar 29 '16 at 16:12
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Incidentally photons might move slower than neutrinos in reality, due to scattering on the way. Is this what your question is about? (I think there was a recent paper about this somewhere...) $\endgroup$ – Andy Mar 29 '16 at 16:41
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, that is something interesting. And neutrino's aren't scattered because they are neutral?! And do they behave the same in curved spacetime, or is it also possible that the geodesic of neutrino's are 'shorter'? $\endgroup$ – Marijn Mar 30 '16 at 8:09
  • $\begingroup$ If you're interested in neutrino arrival times, have a look at Jack's answer and especially SN1987A. That's an example of this difference being noticed. $\endgroup$ – Andy Mar 30 '16 at 8:33
2
$\begingroup$

Yes. When a core collapse supernova happens, it takes a few hours for the shock wave to reach the surface and "break out" (when we first "see" it). Meanwhile, the neutrinos can escape nearly directly once they reach the top of the core.

Of course, as you wrote, photons travel slightly faster, so if the SN is far enough away, the photons might overtake these neutrinos. However, I have not done the calculation to see if the universe is big enough.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Neutrons from such a supernova have been observed (2-3 hours before the photons) and the supernova SN 1987A was close-by in the Large Magellanic Cloud. This is well-known. See this wikipedia article en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1987A . $\endgroup$ – Jack R. Woods Mar 30 '16 at 4:18
  • $\begingroup$ We still cannot rule out that Neutrinos do in fact travel at the speed of light. $\endgroup$ – Dean Mar 30 '16 at 8:54
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not so. We know neutrinos have mass because they oscillate between different species (ie they transform from one species to another, and this requires mass). Since they have mass, special relativity forbids them from achieving light speed. $\endgroup$ – eshaya Mar 31 '16 at 15:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.