Has Science observed the entire process of a star being created when the area of creation was just a void in space? Or is there still missing data that has not been entirely observed and recorded?

I am asking for a simple yes or no if science has fully observed pre birth/Void in space and the entire birth of a star filling the void and what star was created. Please no theory's only scientific fact with a reference thank you.

  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Stars don't emerge from voids, they emerge from interstellar clouds. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage May 17 '16 at 18:08
  • $\begingroup$ @Called2voyage- Your source would be of great credibility can you provide a link so I can fully understand the current data of a stars birth. $\endgroup$ – user5434678 May 17 '16 at 18:16
  • $\begingroup$ Here's one reference: uni.edu/morgans/astro/course/Notes/section2/new7.html. I hesitate to answer directly because you're looking for "hard" evidence instead of theory, and I'm not sure how strictly you intended to judge the answer. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage May 17 '16 at 18:18
  • $\begingroup$ @Called2voyage- You are right about the interstellar clouds, but the Void was there first. What force does science theorize attracted these interstellar clouds? $\endgroup$ – user5434678 May 17 '16 at 18:31
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Your understanding of gravity is flawed. I suggest you read an introduction to astrophysics. $\endgroup$ – called2voyage May 17 '16 at 18:47

The star formation process from giant molecular cloud to unobscured protostar is thought to take about a million years.

So the answer is no.

Similarly, there are very few large scale physical processes that occur in the universe on a human timescale. Nevertheless we are sophisticated enough to understand that you do not necessarily have to see something happening to know that it has occurred and work out how it happened.

Or are you asking whether all the separate phases of the star formation process have been observed in different places? The answer to that is broadly yes. The rarest (shortest) phases is the initial collapse to a "core" that is embedded within an obscuring molecular cloud. Nevertheless, such objects can be seen at sub-mm and radio wavelengths.

  • $\begingroup$ @R.J-A simple yes or no is what I needed, Your extreamly knowledgeable and credible so I will except your answer. $\endgroup$ – user5434678 May 17 '16 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ Yes the core configuration and the process forming or leading up to that event is what drives my ambition. $\endgroup$ – user5434678 May 17 '16 at 18:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.