Globular clusters lie in the galactic halo, outside of the disc. However, galaxies are more or less a collection of material and objects — why is it, then, that most stars form a plane due to the angular momentum, but some patches of stars do not?

In fact, globular clusters often contain some of the earliest stars formed in a galaxy, right? How come they do not flatten, yet a lot of the older stars do?

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here's a speculation that other are free to run with if it leads anywhere. Flattening of a gravitational bound system like that requires lots of inelastic interaction between mass elements. That happens faster in a cloud of gas and dust than in a system of discrete and compact objects like stars and planets. Maybe the early formation of starts in those entities simply put them on a longer scale for thermalization of velocities. $\endgroup$ – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten Jun 26 '16 at 17:16

Globular clusters formed whilst the gas of the proto Milky Way was still approximately spherically distributed.

The gas forms a dissipative system that loses energy and collapses (within the first billion years) to a disk whilst conserving angular momentum.

Formed stars and clusters are essentially collisionless so the halo stars continue to have a spherical distribution, whilst more recently formed stars formed from gas already in a disk and so continue to be in a disk.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.