2
$\begingroup$

How would Hisenberg's unified field equations be represented if gravity is incorporated. Would it result in a case similar to the Heisenberg-Ivanenkov equation, or am I just confused here?

I would really appreciate if the Heisenberg-Ivanenkov equation's essence is explained as there is no firm online source to provide more information.

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by HDE 226868, called2voyage Oct 17 '16 at 16:44

  • This question does not appear to be about astronomy, within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about physics, not astronomy. It's also on Physics Stack Exchange, by the way. $\endgroup$ – HDE 226868 Oct 17 '16 at 15:42
  • $\begingroup$ @HDE226868 Why do all the courses(graduate level) in astronomy have QFT as a separate subject; hence my question. $\endgroup$ – Naveen Balaji Oct 17 '16 at 16:16
  • $\begingroup$ Just because you have to take a course in Field Y to obtain a degree in Field X does not mean that Field Y is a subset of Field X. For instance, many undergraduate chemistry majors may have to take some sort of physics course, yet physics is not a subset of chemistry $\endgroup$ – HDE 226868 Oct 17 '16 at 17:00
  • $\begingroup$ @HDE 226868 ok I do not wish to take this further, I just asked the question hoping that someone would know something about this and provide me some useful info. I had posted this question parallelly on physics SE as well, but did not get any response. Hence, all I wanted by posting this is some knowledge about this not-so-easiy-available topic. If you wish to vote to close, please do go ahead as it's a democracy and you have the right to do that and I'm thankful that you're letting me know before hand. $\endgroup$ – Naveen Balaji Oct 17 '16 at 17:07