2
$\begingroup$

The energy-momentum relation,

$$E^2 = m^2c^4 +p^2c^2,$$

lets us derive the momentum of a massless particle:

$$p = \frac{E}{c} = \frac{h\nu}{c}$$

However, the expansion of the Universe redshifts light. This should decrease the momentum of photons. Where would the momentum go, in order for conservation of momentum to hold?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Is this a different question to astronomy.stackexchange.com/questions/18613/… ? $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Nov 24 '16 at 16:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @RobJeffries Yes, because as far as I know, conservation of energy does not hold in GR. I'm asking about momentum. $\endgroup$ – Sir Cumference Nov 24 '16 at 16:35
  • $\begingroup$ Light blue-shifts as it falls into super-clusters, then red-shifts a little less as it climbs out of the ever-expanding cluster's gravity well. Basically expansion causes universe to not act like a closed system energy or momentum-wise; but this is only on extremely large scales. $\endgroup$ – Wayfaring Stranger Nov 26 '16 at 16:00
5
$\begingroup$

In relativity you can think of a single conservation law that unites conservation of energy and momentum -- conservation of four-momentum. Energy and momentum are the zeroth and the first to third components of the four-momentum respectively. Such conservation laws arise from invariance of the Lagrangian with respect to a translation in space-time coordinates.

In General Relativity these conservation laws are local concepts that (most people think) can only be applied in local, inertial (flat) frames of reference. In particular, they cannot be applied in changing space-times and so cannot be applied to situations involving the expansion of the universe.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.