12
$\begingroup$

I know that some of them are pulsars and pulsars spin very fast, but do all of the neutron stars spin? I would think that they would because of conservation of momentum, but I'm really just not sure.

$\endgroup$
  • 14
    $\begingroup$ Is there any object in space which does not spin? $\endgroup$ – Dominique Feb 3 '17 at 15:11
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ To answer Dominique's rhetorical question, the answer is a resounding "no". $\endgroup$ – Shufflepants Feb 3 '17 at 15:48
  • $\begingroup$ @Shufflepants: Is it? I suppose even an artificial satellite that had been deliberately made not to spin w.r.t. (say) the Earth or the solar system would still then be spinning along with the galaxy or whatever. $\endgroup$ – Lightness Races in Orbit Feb 3 '17 at 17:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @LightnessRacesinOrbit You can't fix a satellite to not spin wrt the Earth. That's just not physically possible. The only thing you can do is go into the reference frame of the spinning satellite and then claim it isn't spinning (as you are for the Earth). But that requires you saying the rest of the Universe is spinning instead. $\endgroup$ – zephyr Feb 3 '17 at 17:28
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ And mostly I was just talking about the fact that it is absurdly unlikely that anything would just happen to have exactly zero angular momentum. If you look at it accounting for the heisenberg uncertainty principle, if something somehow actually wasn't spinning, you'd never be able to prove it. You'd only ever be able to say it's spinning slower than some delta x. And if you found such an object that was spinning more slowly than we can possibly measure, it would be quite the discovery. Everything is spinning, it's just a matter of how fast. $\endgroup$ – Shufflepants Feb 3 '17 at 20:39
16
$\begingroup$

I think it is absolutely safe to say that all neutron stars spin.

Conservation of angular momentum ensures that as they collapse from a massive stellar core the size (roughly) of the Earth, to something with a 10km radius, their angular velocity increases roughly as the square of the decrease in their radius (i.e. a factor of $\sim 4\times 10^5$. Thus, even if the stellar core had the slightest spin to begin with, then the neutron star will be spinning very fast indeed.

Young pulsars appears to be born with rotation periods that vary from about 0.01 s to perhaps a second or so. They then lose angular momentum as they get older.

The difficulty in answering your question without any equivocation is that once neutron stars spin down to periods of longer than 1-10 seconds or so (depending on the pulsar magnetic field strength - see picture below from Wang et al. 2011) then the pulsar mechanism switches off and the neutron star, to all intents and purposes, becomes invisible (the so-called "pulsar deathline", Zhang 2003) .

Pulsar period distribution

It is expected that the spin down will continue, even after the pulsar has switched off, but the spin down rate itself depends on the rotation speed, so the neutron star will never come to a halt, even after tens of billions of years.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting! More information (or a reference) for the pulsar mechanism switching off? $\endgroup$ – Charles Feb 3 '17 at 15:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Charles see edit $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Feb 3 '17 at 16:03
6
$\begingroup$

I'd say every stellar object spin. It comes from the accretion process that cannot be purely radial.

Even if you get the unlikely chance that a stellar object receive the right forces to stop spin in the local place you look it from, next time a small force is applied on it, it will start spinning again (even very slowly).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is true. Angular momentum is a property intrinsic to any free-floating object. It's always non-zero. $\endgroup$ – userLTK Feb 3 '17 at 13:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.