If so by how much does it "spoil" the view of stars and galaxies etc.

Is this error noticable, when compared to pictures taken from outer space.


2 Answers 2


If so by how much does it "spoil" the view of stars and galaxies etc.

There are several very different issues related to your question. Let's tackle them one by one.

Atmospheric refraction

Yes, the Earth's atmosphere refracts light. One notable effect is that objects near horizon appear higher than they should be.

enter image description here

Therefore, the Sun (or any other object) rises earlier than it should, and sets later.


It affects astrometry, because it messes up the coordinates of objects near the horizon. Other than that, it does not cause great harm to astronomy.

And then there are several effects harmful to astronomy:

1. Seeing

What we call in astronomy "seeing" is just air turbulence. Because air moves around due to heat, it distorts the image continuously. This is how the Moon looks like in a telescope - notice the shifting around due to seeing (animated GIF, reload if it's not moving, or open in new tab):

enter image description here

If we lived in a vacuum, that image would be static, and perfectly clear. But turbulence causes the shifting. Also, it causes a blur - the image is less sharp than it could be. It's also what causes the stars to "twinkle".

It's basically the same phenomenon that you see in summer along the hot walls of a house under sunlight - the same shimmering effect of the image seen through the hot rising air along the walls.

For amateur astronomers, seeing affects high-resolution targets such as planets, the Moon, double stars. It does not affect targets that are perceived to be "low-resolution" in an amateur telescope: galaxies, nebulae, star clusters.

More reading:


Since seeing depends on weather, it can be predicted to some extent:


2. Light pollution

Atmosphere also scatters and reflects light back to Earth. All the city lights around you are scattered by haze and dust in the air, and some of that light goes back down into your eye, creating sort of a "light fog".

As a result, objects that are not too bright are masked by light pollution and become less visible, or invisible altogether.

enter image description here

A bigger telescope will help you pierce through the haze of light pollution, but only to some extent. The best way to see faint objects is to put the scope in the car and drive far away from the city.

Here's a light pollution map:


For amateur astronomers, light pollution affects the "faint fuzzies": galaxies, nebulae, star clusters. It has no effect whatsoever on bright objects such as: planets, the Moon, many double stars.

Other ways the atmosphere can negatively impact observations:

  • clouds - this is an obvious one

  • transparency - different from clouds, it includes haze, dust, particulate matter, water vapor. It affects low contrast objects such as galaxies.

  • $\begingroup$ Wow, great detailed answer! Thank you very much. $\endgroup$
    – udiboy1209
    Apr 23, 2014 at 12:45
  • $\begingroup$ the dark sky finder link is a magical resource - thanks! $\endgroup$
    – Fattie
    Jul 20, 2016 at 21:53

It does not act as a solid lens, because it does not have a limit surface. Instead, atmosphere's density varies slowly with altitude.

Since its refractive index is very close to 1 it is hardly noticeable any refraction. You will note it mostly on the horizon.

The three main effects of atmosphere are

  1. Reddening, caused by differential scattering on the wavelenghts

  2. Absorption

  3. Seeing (Airy's disc)

  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Number 3 suggests an incorrect correlation. Seeing is atmospheric turbulence. Airy's disk is produced by diffraction in the instrument. $\endgroup$ Apr 22, 2014 at 18:47
  • $\begingroup$ @FlorinAndrei You are quite right. Seeing is the blur of the Airy's disc. $\endgroup$
    – Envite
    Apr 23, 2014 at 9:00

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .