4
$\begingroup$

I was pondering our insignificance, when I wondered - how much smaller is our planet then the (observable) universe? And being as I don't know how to do the math, I'm asking it here.

So how many of our planet (in space it occupies - i.e. ignoring space between the space between the spheres) can fit inside the known/observable universe?

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Really to me this question is pointless. I mean, the answer is obviously going to be a ridiculously big number, so what does it changes to you if it is 10^50 or 10^100?? $\endgroup$ – harogaston May 13 '14 at 23:40
  • $\begingroup$ i was trying to find something to compare it to, in order to better understand it and relay it. $\endgroup$ – Math chiller May 14 '14 at 1:49
15
$\begingroup$

Without checking the numbers in detail, according to Wikipedia, the volume of the observable universe is about $3.5\cdot 10^{80} \mbox{ m}^3$, and the volume of Earth is about $1.08321\cdot 10^{21} \mbox{ m}^3$.

By dividing the two volumes we get a factor of $3.2\cdot 10^{59}$, or written as decimal number: The observable comoving volume of the universe is about 320,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000-times the volume of Earth.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ dats alot, woah! $\endgroup$ – Math chiller May 13 '14 at 17:14
  • 12
    $\begingroup$ Your answer assumes we are pulverizing the earth to completely fill the volume of a universe-sized container. Without getting into the complicated math behind forming optimal latices of congruent spheres, you should multiply your answer by a factor of pi/(3*sqrt(2)) or about 0.74048. The Kepler Conjecture says that is the highest density that can be achieved by any arrangement of spheres. Oh, and since the observable universe is also expanding at an accelerated rate, you should also update your answer every few hundred millions years just to be safe. Just saying. $\endgroup$ – Robert Cartaino May 14 '14 at 16:44
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ @RobertCartaino That's why I just provided two valid digits; so the numbers should be valid more or less next week, too. ;) Btw. sorry for pressing Earth into a cube, next time I'll be more careful. $\endgroup$ – Gerald May 15 '14 at 9:37
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That's about the same as the number of atoms in the largest stars. $\endgroup$ – Steve Linton May 13 '19 at 11:01
  • $\begingroup$ @SteveLinton So the Earth is to the universe as an atom is to a very large star. $\endgroup$ – Florin Andrei May 14 '19 at 5:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.