1
$\begingroup$

In this answer I have rearranged an equation from somewhere, and now I can not relocate the source. My re-aranged form is:

$$M_{Abs} = 5 \left(\log_{10}(1329) -\frac{1}{2}\log_{10}(\text{albedo}) -\log_{10}(D_{km})\right)$$

This is the relationship between the absolute magnitude of an object and its diameter and albedo, assuming it is spherical.

Question: What is a good source for any form of this equation to which I can link in my answer?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This shouldn't be hard to derive. Twice as large = 4 times as bright, double the albedo = double the brightness, convert both to changes in magnitude, and apply to original absolute magnitude. $\endgroup$ – barrycarter Apr 23 '18 at 21:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Found while reading for another Q: Wikipedia: Absolute magnitude: Planets $\endgroup$ – Mike G Jun 25 at 4:57
  • $\begingroup$ @MikeG Yep, thanks! While I don't see the exact expression there verbatim but I see enough pieces of it in similar form that it is certainly there in spirit. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jun 25 at 5:03
2
$\begingroup$

The JPL CNEOS asteroid size estimator and various asteroid albedo papers cite Harris and Harris 1997. That paper is behind a paywall, but Stuart and Binzel 2004 attribute this formula to it: $$ H = C - 5 \log_{10} D - 2.5 \log_{10} p_V$$ where $H$ is absolute magnitude, $p_V$ is albedo, and $C$ = 15.618.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's numerically equivalent and so it will do, thank you! I'm still going to try to find the source that has the exact expression log${}_{10}$(1329) in my own quixocity because it bothers me that I've lost a reference (I suspect due to a variant of this). $\endgroup$ – uhoh Apr 23 '18 at 22:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.