I am wanting to plot a velocity profile (a plot of velocity against the star's distance from the galactic core) from the Gaia DR2, but so far my efforts have been disappointing.

The information I have for each star are the declination ($\delta$), right ascension ($\alpha$), radial velocity ($v_r$), parallax ($\theta_\text{parallax}$) and proper motion ($\mu$) (ra and dec).

I tried to calculate the star's distance from the galactic core using the cosine rule:

$$ d = \frac{1000}{\theta_{\text{parallax}}}$$ $$\theta = \arccos{[\sin{\delta_\text{star}}\sin{\delta_\text{core}} + \cos{\delta_\text{star}}\cos{\delta_\text{core}}\cos{(\alpha_\text{star}-\alpha_\text{core})}]}$$ $$ r = \sqrt{d_\text{core}^2+ d^2 - 2d \times d_\text{core} \times \cos{\theta}} $$

Where $d$ is the distance from the Sun to the star. $d_\text{core}$ is the distance from the Sun to the galactic core. $\theta$ is the angular separation of the star and the galactic core. $r$ is the distance from the star to the core.

And the star's speed using the equations:

$$\mu = \sqrt{\mu_\text{dec}^2 + \mu_\text{ra}^2}$$ $$ v_t = 4.7 \mu d $$ $$ v = \sqrt{v_r^2 + v_t^2} $$

But the plot doesn't show any kind of trend (just a kind of blob). Have I calculated correctly and, if not, how could I calculate the tangential velocities and radius from the galactic core?

Basically, I want to make the kind of plot that helps us identify dark matter in galaxies.

  • $\begingroup$ Note that I am placing restrictions on the allowed parallax error, as advised $\endgroup$
    – Beta Decay
    May 21 '18 at 19:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You haven't calculated a velocity, you have calculated a speed. You need the velocity at a tangent to the line from the star to the Galactic centre. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    May 21 '18 at 23:00
  • $\begingroup$ Also note that given a 0.1 mas systematic error in parallax, you won't get accurate tangential velocities beyond about 2kpc from the Sun. $\endgroup$
    – ProfRob
    May 21 '18 at 23:02
  • $\begingroup$ @RobJeffries Would that be standard for a telescope like Gaia? It seems like a large uncertainty to me $\endgroup$
    – Beta Decay
    May 22 '18 at 6:14
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @B--rian I haven't unfortunately, but I might revisit it over the summer $\endgroup$
    – Beta Decay
    Jun 29 at 13:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.