3
$\begingroup$

The exact question goes like this: In the real Universe the expansion is not completely uniform. Rather, galaxies exhibit some random motion relative to the overall Hubble expansion, known as their peculiar velocity and caused by the gravitational pull of their near neighbours. Supposing that a typical (e.g. root mean square) galaxy peculiar velocity is 600 km s-1, how far away would a galaxy have to be before it could be used to determine the Hubble constant to ten per cent accuracy, supposing

(a) The true value of the Hubble constant is 100 km s-1 Mpc-1?

(b) The true value of the Hubble constant is 50 km s-1 Mpc-1

Assume in your calculation that the galaxy distance and redshift could be measured exactly. Unfortunately, that is not true of real observations.

I started off by writing the hubbles equation and as they mentioned it should be accurate to 10% so its peculiar velocity (given as about 600 km/s) is less than or equal to 10% of its expansion velocity. But this gives me different answer.

The actual answer to the problem as stated in the book is Slightly different answers are possible depending how you deal with the rms velocity. You should get something like r > 35 Mpc for H0 = 100km s-1 and r > 70Mpc for Ho = 50kms-1

What am I missing here? Has it got to do with the RMS velocity as mentioned? Please explain.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Depending how you deal with the rms velocity"... How many different values or ways to calculate this are there? $\endgroup$ – user10106 Jun 1 '18 at 11:42
  • $\begingroup$ The point is that peculiar velocities vary. So in working backwards from 10% accuracy you need to allow for the chance that you picked a galaxy with high or low preculiar velocity, You also need to allow for the chance that it has that velocity, but sideways, rather than radially. $\endgroup$ – Steve Linton Jun 1 '18 at 12:09
2
$\begingroup$

From the definition of the rms (e.g. here), $$ \mathrm{rms}^2(x) = \langle x \rangle^2 + \sigma_x^2, $$ where $\langle x \rangle$ is the mean value, and $\sigma_x$ is the dispersion.

For galaxies with random velocities, the mean velocity should be $\langle x \rangle = 0$, unless they drift in some direction. Hence, the velocity dispersion should be $600\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$.

For randomly distributed velocities, the speed $V_{||}$ you measure along your line of sight (LOS) is a factor $\sqrt{3}$ smaller, i.e. $\sim350\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$.

Thus, to get a 10% accuracy, the mean value should be 10 times larger, i.e. $\sim 3500\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}$.

For a Hubble constant of $H_0 = 100\,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, that corresponds to a distance of $$ d = \frac{v_{||}}{H_0} \simeq 35\,\mathrm{Mpc}, $$ while for $50 \,\mathrm{km}\,\mathrm{s}^{-1}\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$ you get $70\,\mathrm{Mpc}$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.