6
$\begingroup$

As far as I was aware, stars don't usually have lithium, but it has been observed that there is plenty of lithium on our star's surface.

In addition, a team lead by Garik Israelian took a census of 500 stars, 70 of which are known to host planets and about a quarter of which are particularly Sun-like. Using ESO’s HARPS spectrograph, this team of astronomers (see here) found that the Sun-like stars which host planets have destroyed their lithium much more efficiently than “planet-free” stars.

Why do Sun-like stars have lithium on their surfaces and why do stars that host planets destroy their lithium more efficiently?

$\endgroup$
13
$\begingroup$

The Sun has lithium because, like all the elements that it has heavier than helium, it was born with it.

Many stars, particularly older metal-rich stars or cool stars with deep convective envelopes show very little Li in their atmosphere - and that is true for the Sun too. But this trace of lithium is still detectable (just).

By comparison with meteorites, we know that the Sun was born with about 100 times the abundance of Li that is seen in its photosphere now. Roughly speaking, about 20% of this Li was produced by big-bang nucleosynthesis and the rest was likely produced, before the Sun was born, in (giant) stars and (classical) novae via rather complicated synthesis and mixing routes.

Most of the Sun's Li has been destroyed in its interior. It reacts with protons to form helium at temperatures lower than required for hydrogen fusion. However, the exterior of the Sun has not been completely mixed with the interior, so a little still remains in the photosphere.

As to why stars with planets deplete their Li more efficiently, well there is still a bit of a question mark over whether that is true or not. If it is, then it probably has something to do with the history of rotation and angular momentum loss in the star. Stars with long-lived, planet-forming discs may have spun down more readily, creating an internal differential rotation that aids the mixing process. It is a clear observational result, that slower-rotating stars in young clusters have depleted more Li than their faster rotating siblings.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.