2
$\begingroup$

I wrote a quickie answer where I estimate the total rotational angular momentum of Jupiter as about 7E+38 kg m^2/s. However it bothers me because one of the sources gets this number assuming uniform density, and the other two cite 6.9E+38 kg m^2/s but it's not clear to me where this comes from.

Are there better estimates that use reasonable models for Jupiter's density distribution?

update: If not answerable due to uncertainties in density distribution and/or gradients in rotation rate (i.e. non rigid-body rotation) which I sort-of remember reading about recently, then an explanation why a better value isn't available would be an acceptable answer.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Not sure you can do the $n=3/2$ polytrope analytically. $\endgroup$ – Rob Jeffries Jan 1 at 8:41
2
+200
$\begingroup$

A better estimate might be to use the moment of inertia of a $n=3/2$ (fully convective) polytrope, which will be a good approximation in an object like Jupiter, even when it approaches electron degeneracy in its interior. You can look this up and it is given by $I = kMR^2$, with $k=0.205$ (almost exactly a factor of two smaller than a uniform sphere because the mass is concentrated towards the centre).

If we use a mass $M$ of $1.898 \times 10^{27}$ kg, the equatorial radius of Jupiter ($R=71500$ km) and the rotation rate determined from its magnetosphere ($P= 9.93$ hours), then the angular momentum ($2\pi I/P$) is $3.496 \times 10^{38}$ kg m$^2$ s$^{-1}$.

If instead, we use the volumetric average radius of $R=69900$ km, this reduces to $3.34\times 10^{38}$ kg m$^2$ s$^{-1}$.

This simple approach neglects the more complicated equation of state of Jupiter, it's non-sphericity and the probable presence of a solid core. Consideration of these, together with constraints provided by the measured even harmonics of the gravitational field (referred to as $J_2$ and $J_4$, led Helled et al. (2011) to suggest that $k=0.264$, with an uncertainty below 1%. Combined with the average radius, this gives $4.30\times 10^{38}$ kg m$^2$ s$^{-1}$.

More recent work by Ni (2018) has used refinements to the gravitational harmonics from Juno measurements, along with a more sophisticated interior model to suggest $k=0.274$ with 0.5% uncertainty.

| improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I missed the bounty award deadline so have re-bountied. Thanks for the excellent answer! $\endgroup$ – uhoh Jan 1 at 3:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.